Factors that influence policy decisions in literacy: Perspectives of key policy informants

Maryann Mraz
{"title":"Factors that influence policy decisions in literacy: Perspectives of key policy informants","authors":"Maryann Mraz","doi":"10.1080/19388070509558409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of key policy informants on the factors that they believed influence policy decisions in literacy education. Participants were selected because they had significantly influenced, or had attempted to influence, policy decisions in literacy at either the national or state level. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants and four nominated informants. An inductive data analysis revealed five broad domains that addressed the participants’ perspective on factors of influence: literacy professionals, public sentiment, selected policy participants, conservative voices, and research.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"43 1","pages":"20 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070509558409","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070509558409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of key policy informants on the factors that they believed influence policy decisions in literacy education. Participants were selected because they had significantly influenced, or had attempted to influence, policy decisions in literacy at either the national or state level. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven key informants and four nominated informants. An inductive data analysis revealed five broad domains that addressed the participants’ perspective on factors of influence: literacy professionals, public sentiment, selected policy participants, conservative voices, and research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响扫盲政策决策的因素:关键政策举报人的观点
摘要本研究旨在探讨主要政策举报人对影响扫盲教育政策决策因素的看法。选择参与者是因为他们对国家或州一级的扫盲政策决定产生了重大影响或试图产生影响。对7名关键举报人和4名提名举报人进行了半结构化访谈。归纳数据分析揭示了参与者对影响因素的看法的五个广泛领域:扫盲专业人员、公众情绪、选定的政策参与者、保守派声音和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five-year Pan-European, longitudinal surveillance of Clostridium difficile ribotype prevalence and antimicrobial resistance: the extended ClosER study. Bringing television back to the bedroom: Transactions between a seventh grade struggling reader and her mathematics teacher “Kiss your brain”: A closer look at flourishing literacy gains in impoverished elementary schools “I talk them through it”: Teacher mediation of picturebooks with sparse verbal text during whole‐class readalouds Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK‐12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1