{"title":"Some Unpublished Notes by Marsilio Ficino on Plato's Parmenides In MS Laur. 89 SUP. 71","authors":"Valerio Sanzotta","doi":"10.1086/JWCI24396008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I t is well established that Marsilio Ficino's already be found in his autograph notes account of Plato's Parmenides depends on on Proclus's Platonic Theology in Florence, the onto-theological reading of it endorsed Biblioteca Riccardiana MS 70 (folios ir by Proclus and other Neoplatonists. Already 4V), copied by Matthaeus Camariota; this in antiquity, this approach stood opposed manuscript contains Proclus's Platonic to that of Albinus and Alcinous, who both Theology, Elements of Theology and Elements held that the Parmenides should be interof Physics, as well as Ocellus Lucanus's preted as a logical treatise.1 It was Proclus's On the Nature of the Universe, which Ficino commentary on the dialogue which Ficino studied and probably translated before had on his desk, as his main source, while 1463.3 Moreover, in the argumentum to his working on his own full-scale commentary, translation of the dialogue, dedicated to written between 1492 and 1494 and Cosimo de' Medici before August 1464— published in 1496.2 The work was the fruit one of his earliest attempts at an interpre of Ficino's reflections on the Parmenides tation of the Parmenides—Ficino already over thirty years, developing from his early sides with the theological reading, stating reading of Proclus. References to the theothat Plato 'included the entirety of theology logical interpretation of the Parmenides can in the Parmenides' ('universam in Parmenide","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"77 1","pages":"211 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI24396008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
I t is well established that Marsilio Ficino's already be found in his autograph notes account of Plato's Parmenides depends on on Proclus's Platonic Theology in Florence, the onto-theological reading of it endorsed Biblioteca Riccardiana MS 70 (folios ir by Proclus and other Neoplatonists. Already 4V), copied by Matthaeus Camariota; this in antiquity, this approach stood opposed manuscript contains Proclus's Platonic to that of Albinus and Alcinous, who both Theology, Elements of Theology and Elements held that the Parmenides should be interof Physics, as well as Ocellus Lucanus's preted as a logical treatise.1 It was Proclus's On the Nature of the Universe, which Ficino commentary on the dialogue which Ficino studied and probably translated before had on his desk, as his main source, while 1463.3 Moreover, in the argumentum to his working on his own full-scale commentary, translation of the dialogue, dedicated to written between 1492 and 1494 and Cosimo de' Medici before August 1464— published in 1496.2 The work was the fruit one of his earliest attempts at an interpre of Ficino's reflections on the Parmenides tation of the Parmenides—Ficino already over thirty years, developing from his early sides with the theological reading, stating reading of Proclus. References to the theothat Plato 'included the entirety of theology logical interpretation of the Parmenides can in the Parmenides' ('universam in Parmenide
如果马尔西利奥·菲西诺在他的亲笔笔记中对柏拉图的巴门尼德的描述是根据普罗克劳斯在佛罗伦萨的柏拉图神学,对它的对神学的解读得到了普罗克劳斯和其他新柏拉图主义者的认可。已经4V),由马特乌斯·卡马里奥塔复制;在古代,这种方法是对立的,手稿中有普罗克劳斯的柏拉图论,有阿尔比努斯和阿尔奇诺斯的柏拉图论,他们的《神学》、《神学的要素》和《要素》都认为巴门尼德应该是物理学的中间部分,还有奥塞勒斯·卢坎努斯的逻辑论文这是普罗克劳斯的《论宇宙的本质》费西诺对对话的评论费西诺之前研究并可能翻译过的那本评论放在他的桌子上,作为他的主要资料,1463.3此外,在他自己对对话进行全面评论和翻译的论证中,写于1492年至1494年,科西莫·德·美第奇在1464年8月之前出版于1496.2年,这部作品是他最早尝试解释菲西诺对巴门尼德的思考的成果之一,菲西诺已经有30多年了,从他早期的神学阅读发展而来,陈述阅读《Proclus》。柏拉图在巴门尼德的《巴门尼德的宇宙》(universam in Parmenides)中包含了对巴门尼德能的全部神学逻辑解释