Avascular necrosis: Is there a role for biomechanical examination as a potential modality for its detection and treatment?

R. Longworth, N. Chockalingam
{"title":"Avascular necrosis: Is there a role for biomechanical examination as a potential modality for its detection and treatment?","authors":"R. Longworth, N. Chockalingam","doi":"10.1080/17536146.2016.1243290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) is often idiopathic and has an incidence of 3/100 000. The prevalence is much higher however in patients who have received steroid therapy such as leukaemia survivors, who have an incidence of 1.2–29%. AVN is most commonly found in weight-bearing epiphyses with the most affected site being the femoral head, so gait abnormalities are to be expected with its progression. Most authors agree that early recognition and treatment of the condition, reduces the disabling effects of it. This review looks at the role of gait analysis in the recognition and treatment of AVN. Discussion: The quality of life of patients with AVN is known to be significantly worse than those without it. Early diagnosis and effective bone protective intervention are thought to be essential for the successful treatment of AVN with high-risk patients likely to benefit from early screening for it. As the majority of AVN is in the lower limb, and the vast majority of that is in the hip, one may assume that gait would be affected when it is present, but very little research has used gait analysis to assess this condition. We postulate that structured gait analysis could form the basis of a conservative approach to the management of hip AVN in cancer survivors. This has the potential to be a more cost effective detection strategy than MRI as well as a method of informing and evaluating conservative therapy for it. Summary: The markedly increased risk of AVN in cancer survivors has the potential to further reduce their quality of life and expose them to invasive surgery. Exploring this issue from a mechanical perspective might not only constitute a novel approach to its detection and treatment, but also reduce the socioeconomic burden related to it. Biomechanical gait analysis has the potential to improve patient experience and improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":88907,"journal":{"name":"International musculoskeletal medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"59 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17536146.2016.1243290","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17536146.2016.1243290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) is often idiopathic and has an incidence of 3/100 000. The prevalence is much higher however in patients who have received steroid therapy such as leukaemia survivors, who have an incidence of 1.2–29%. AVN is most commonly found in weight-bearing epiphyses with the most affected site being the femoral head, so gait abnormalities are to be expected with its progression. Most authors agree that early recognition and treatment of the condition, reduces the disabling effects of it. This review looks at the role of gait analysis in the recognition and treatment of AVN. Discussion: The quality of life of patients with AVN is known to be significantly worse than those without it. Early diagnosis and effective bone protective intervention are thought to be essential for the successful treatment of AVN with high-risk patients likely to benefit from early screening for it. As the majority of AVN is in the lower limb, and the vast majority of that is in the hip, one may assume that gait would be affected when it is present, but very little research has used gait analysis to assess this condition. We postulate that structured gait analysis could form the basis of a conservative approach to the management of hip AVN in cancer survivors. This has the potential to be a more cost effective detection strategy than MRI as well as a method of informing and evaluating conservative therapy for it. Summary: The markedly increased risk of AVN in cancer survivors has the potential to further reduce their quality of life and expose them to invasive surgery. Exploring this issue from a mechanical perspective might not only constitute a novel approach to its detection and treatment, but also reduce the socioeconomic burden related to it. Biomechanical gait analysis has the potential to improve patient experience and improve outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血性坏死:生物力学检查是否可以作为一种潜在的检测和治疗方法?
背景:缺血性坏死(AVN)通常是特发性的,发生率为3/ 100000。然而,在接受类固醇治疗的患者中,发病率要高得多,如白血病幸存者,发病率为1.2-29%。AVN最常见于负重骨骺,最受影响的部位是股骨头,因此随着其进展,步态异常是预期的。大多数作者都同意,早期识别和治疗这种情况,可以减少它的致残效果。这篇综述着眼于步态分析在识别和治疗AVN中的作用。讨论:已知AVN患者的生活质量明显比没有AVN的患者差。早期诊断和有效的骨保护干预被认为是成功治疗AVN的关键,高风险患者可能从早期筛查中受益。由于大多数AVN发生在下肢,而且绝大多数发生在髋关节,人们可能会认为,当AVN出现时,步态会受到影响,但很少有研究使用步态分析来评估这种情况。我们假设结构化的步态分析可以为癌症幸存者髋部AVN的保守治疗提供基础。这可能是一种比MRI更具成本效益的检测策略,也是一种告知和评估保守治疗的方法。总结:癌症幸存者发生AVN的风险显著增加,有可能进一步降低他们的生活质量,并使他们暴露于侵入性手术。从力学角度探讨这一问题不仅可以为其检测和治疗提供新的途径,而且可以减轻与之相关的社会经济负担。生物力学步态分析具有改善患者体验和改善结果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Musculo-skeletal and neurological aspects of Lyme disease Lyme disease: A patient's journey The effectiveness of scapular taping on pain and function in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare a novel group physiotherapy programme with a standard group exercise programme for managing chronic low back pain in primary care End of an era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1