In The Flow by Boris Groys

Q2 Arts and Humanities Visual Culture in Britain Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1080/14714787.2016.1228662
Thibault Bennett
{"title":"In The Flow by Boris Groys","authors":"Thibault Bennett","doi":"10.1080/14714787.2016.1228662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aside from quantifiable political, technological and social changes, how might we understand the differences between our cultural era and those of the past? Boris Groys posits our contemporary age as one whose chief interest is in its own contemporaneity. While the Renaissance was interested in reviving classical antiquity, and Modernity in breaking with the past while looking to the future, Postmodernity is left making sense of a globalized, pluralistic, heterogeneous present. Evidence of our navelgazing can be found in the proliferation of museums, galleries and art fairs dedicated to the exploration of what it means to be contemporary, each, in its own way, contributing to a zeitgeist whose essence eludes clear definition. In the Flow, like his previous titles Art Power and Under Suspicion, is a collection of essays penned by Groys over the past half-decade. The ideas succinctly flow into each other, analysing the intersections of technological progress, politics and culture. His view is expansive, as the writing comfortably assembles centuries of theory into what he calls a rheology of art: ‘discussion of art as flowing’. Currently the globally distinguished Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies at New York University and Senior Research Fellow at the Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design in Germany, as well as a curator and critic, Groys is identifiably one of the prominent art theorists of our time. His qualified depth of thinking is displayed convincingly in such essays as ‘Becoming Revolutionary: On Kazimir Malevich’, where he poses the question of whether the Russian avant-garde was a co-producer of the October Revolution of 1917. If yes, he asks, can it function as a model for contemporary art practices that aspire to political and social change? The essay concludes with the idea that being a revolutionary artist means to submit your self and work to this ‘universal material flow’ that destroys all temporary political and aesthetic orders. One must allow materialist product to become ‘infected’ by this infinite non-teleological process, as opposed to resisting it in a misguided goal for immediate social change. In linking the twentieth century of thought to the present day, Groys thrillingly glances off moments in history like a factually grounded Baudrillard crafting original, refreshing takes on a breadth of topics including the archive, modernism, activism, information technologies, globalism and mass media. Connecting the essays is this idea of flow, which appears like a strand running through the book. Depending on context, the word might address the liberation, destruction and reproducibility of information or conjure imagery of global capital networks or the circuitry of exchange between subjects and objects collectively, which make up a web of ideas","PeriodicalId":35078,"journal":{"name":"Visual Culture in Britain","volume":"17 1","pages":"351 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2016.1228662","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Culture in Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2016.1228662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aside from quantifiable political, technological and social changes, how might we understand the differences between our cultural era and those of the past? Boris Groys posits our contemporary age as one whose chief interest is in its own contemporaneity. While the Renaissance was interested in reviving classical antiquity, and Modernity in breaking with the past while looking to the future, Postmodernity is left making sense of a globalized, pluralistic, heterogeneous present. Evidence of our navelgazing can be found in the proliferation of museums, galleries and art fairs dedicated to the exploration of what it means to be contemporary, each, in its own way, contributing to a zeitgeist whose essence eludes clear definition. In the Flow, like his previous titles Art Power and Under Suspicion, is a collection of essays penned by Groys over the past half-decade. The ideas succinctly flow into each other, analysing the intersections of technological progress, politics and culture. His view is expansive, as the writing comfortably assembles centuries of theory into what he calls a rheology of art: ‘discussion of art as flowing’. Currently the globally distinguished Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies at New York University and Senior Research Fellow at the Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design in Germany, as well as a curator and critic, Groys is identifiably one of the prominent art theorists of our time. His qualified depth of thinking is displayed convincingly in such essays as ‘Becoming Revolutionary: On Kazimir Malevich’, where he poses the question of whether the Russian avant-garde was a co-producer of the October Revolution of 1917. If yes, he asks, can it function as a model for contemporary art practices that aspire to political and social change? The essay concludes with the idea that being a revolutionary artist means to submit your self and work to this ‘universal material flow’ that destroys all temporary political and aesthetic orders. One must allow materialist product to become ‘infected’ by this infinite non-teleological process, as opposed to resisting it in a misguided goal for immediate social change. In linking the twentieth century of thought to the present day, Groys thrillingly glances off moments in history like a factually grounded Baudrillard crafting original, refreshing takes on a breadth of topics including the archive, modernism, activism, information technologies, globalism and mass media. Connecting the essays is this idea of flow, which appears like a strand running through the book. Depending on context, the word might address the liberation, destruction and reproducibility of information or conjure imagery of global capital networks or the circuitry of exchange between subjects and objects collectively, which make up a web of ideas
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在鲍里斯·格罗伊斯的《流动》中
除了可量化的政治、技术和社会变化,我们如何理解我们的文化时代与过去的文化时代之间的差异?鲍里斯·格罗伊斯(Boris Groys)认为,我们这个时代的主要兴趣在于它自身的当代性。文艺复兴的兴趣在于复兴古典,而现代性的兴趣在于与过去决裂,展望未来,而后现代性则是为了理解全球化、多元、异质的当下。博物馆、画廊和艺术博览会层出不穷,它们致力于探索什么是当代,每一个都以自己的方式为一种本质难以明确定义的时代精神做出贡献。与他之前的作品《艺术力量》和《猜疑之下》一样,《在流动中》是格罗伊斯在过去五年里写的散文集。这些观点简洁地相互交融,分析了技术进步、政治和文化的交叉点。他的观点是广泛的,因为他的作品轻松地将几个世纪的理论整合到他所谓的艺术流变学中:“对流动艺术的讨论”。格罗伊斯目前是纽约大学俄罗斯和斯拉夫研究的全球知名教授,德国卡尔斯鲁厄艺术与设计大学的高级研究员,以及策展人和评论家,是我们这个时代公认的杰出艺术理论家之一。在《成为革命者:论卡齐米尔·马列维奇》一书中,他提出了一个问题,即俄国先锋派是否是1917年十月革命的共同制作人。他问道,如果是的话,它能否成为渴望政治和社会变革的当代艺术实践的典范?这篇文章的结论是,作为一名革命艺术家意味着将你的自我和作品屈从于这种“普遍的物质流动”,这种物质流动摧毁了所有暂时的政治和美学秩序。我们必须允许唯物主义产品被这种无限的非目的论过程“感染”,而不是以一种被误导的目标来抵制它,以实现直接的社会变革。在将二十世纪的思想与当今联系起来的过程中,格罗伊斯令人兴奋地回顾了历史上的一些时刻,就像一个以事实为基础的鲍德里亚,他在档案、现代主义、行动主义、信息技术、全球主义和大众媒体等广泛的主题上创造了原创的、令人耳目一新的作品。连接这些文章的是“流”的概念,就像贯穿全书的一条线。根据语境的不同,这个词可以表达信息的解放、破坏和可复制性,也可以让人联想到全球资本网络或主体与客体之间的交换回路,它们共同构成了一个思想之网
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Culture in Britain
Visual Culture in Britain Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
John Carter FSA (1748–1817): A New Corpus of Drawings, and the Painted Chamber ‘Welcome to the North’: Public Art, Place-Marketing and the Northern Imaginary ‘Something useful in a National sense’: Percy Hennell’s Surgical and Nationalist Colour Photography, 1940–1948 Contesting Women’s Right to Vote: Anti-Suffrage Postcards in Edwardian Britain ‘Seeing-as’: The Modality of Looking in Bacon’s Portraiture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1