Crops grown in mixtures show niche partitioning in spatial water uptake

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.14088
Anja Schmutz, Christian Sch?b
{"title":"Crops grown in mixtures show niche partitioning in spatial water uptake","authors":"Anja Schmutz, Christian Sch?b","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More diverse plant communities generally produce more biomass than monocultures. This benefit of plant diversity is supposed to stem from resource partitioning of species in mixtures. Different plant species might use the resources spatially, temporally, or chemically in different ways. Along the same lines, for agricultural production crop mixtures outperform monocultures. Differences in vertical root distributions of crop species in mixtures could explain such higher yield. Here we used the stable isotopes of water and a Bayesian model to investigate the spatial water uptake patterns of six different crops species and how these patterns differ depending on the crop diversity. In addition, we calculated niche overlaps of water uptake as an indicator for belowground spatial niche partitioning, compared them among the different diversity levels, and linked them to productivity. The spatial water uptake pattern differed among crop species. The effect of crop diversity had a minor effect on water uptake but varied strongly depending on the crop species. Niche overlap in spatial water uptake was highest in monocultures and decreased strongly in mixtures. Furthermore, productivity in mixtures was higher compared to monoculture. Additionally, we showed that increased competition intensity leads to stronger changes in water uptake patterns. Synthesis. We found evidence for niche partitioning of spatial water uptake, and therefore complementary spatial root distribution, and higher productivity in crop mixtures compared to monocultures. Consequently, a more efficient use of soil resources in intercropping systems might explain their yield benefits.","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"111 5","pages":"1151-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.14088","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.14088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

More diverse plant communities generally produce more biomass than monocultures. This benefit of plant diversity is supposed to stem from resource partitioning of species in mixtures. Different plant species might use the resources spatially, temporally, or chemically in different ways. Along the same lines, for agricultural production crop mixtures outperform monocultures. Differences in vertical root distributions of crop species in mixtures could explain such higher yield. Here we used the stable isotopes of water and a Bayesian model to investigate the spatial water uptake patterns of six different crops species and how these patterns differ depending on the crop diversity. In addition, we calculated niche overlaps of water uptake as an indicator for belowground spatial niche partitioning, compared them among the different diversity levels, and linked them to productivity. The spatial water uptake pattern differed among crop species. The effect of crop diversity had a minor effect on water uptake but varied strongly depending on the crop species. Niche overlap in spatial water uptake was highest in monocultures and decreased strongly in mixtures. Furthermore, productivity in mixtures was higher compared to monoculture. Additionally, we showed that increased competition intensity leads to stronger changes in water uptake patterns. Synthesis. We found evidence for niche partitioning of spatial water uptake, and therefore complementary spatial root distribution, and higher productivity in crop mixtures compared to monocultures. Consequently, a more efficient use of soil resources in intercropping systems might explain their yield benefits.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混种作物在空间吸水方面表现出生态位分区
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
期刊最新文献
Environmental conditions affect the allelopathic potential of three invasive alien plants species in North-Eastern France Indirect effects of warming via phenology on reproductive success of alpine plants Rhizosphere as a hotspot for microbial necromass deposition into the soil carbon pool Aerial litter mimicry: A novel form of floral deception mediated by a monoterpene synthase Cover Picture and Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1