Polling Officials: The Strength and Weakness of Democratic Systems

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Election Law Journal Pub Date : 2015-12-17 DOI:10.1089/ELJ.2015.0308
KillesteynEd
{"title":"Polling Officials: The Strength and Weakness of Democratic Systems","authors":"KillesteynEd","doi":"10.1089/ELJ.2015.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The scale and logistical demands of conducting elections means that they are typically delivered by many thousands of men and women employed for very short periods of time, most no more than a single day every three, four, or five years depending upon the constitutional requirements or electoral laws of the country concerned. The inevitable fact that elections can only be delivered “through” the individual and collective efforts of large numbers of ordinary men and women drawn from the community represents a fundamental strength of democratic systems. Their involvement provides transparency, credibility, and a strong sense of participation in the process that ultimately determines who will be installed as the government of the day to make decisions affecting the lives of the country's citizens. Yet, some recent events in Australia (and elsewhere) involving significant errors made by polling officials demonstrate that the involvement of these same men and women from the community represents a chal...","PeriodicalId":45644,"journal":{"name":"Election Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/ELJ.2015.0308","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Election Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ELJ.2015.0308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The scale and logistical demands of conducting elections means that they are typically delivered by many thousands of men and women employed for very short periods of time, most no more than a single day every three, four, or five years depending upon the constitutional requirements or electoral laws of the country concerned. The inevitable fact that elections can only be delivered “through” the individual and collective efforts of large numbers of ordinary men and women drawn from the community represents a fundamental strength of democratic systems. Their involvement provides transparency, credibility, and a strong sense of participation in the process that ultimately determines who will be installed as the government of the day to make decisions affecting the lives of the country's citizens. Yet, some recent events in Australia (and elsewhere) involving significant errors made by polling officials demonstrate that the involvement of these same men and women from the community represents a chal...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投票官员:民主制度的优缺点
进行选举的规模和后勤要求意味着,选举通常由数千名受雇的男女在很短的时间内完成,根据有关国家的宪法要求或选举法,每三年、四年或五年最多不超过一天。选举只能“通过”从社会中选出的大批普通男女的个人和集体努力才能实现,这一不可避免的事实代表了民主制度的基本力量。他们的参与提供了透明度、可信性和强烈的参与感,最终决定谁将被任命为政府,做出影响该国公民生活的决策。然而,最近在澳大利亚(和其他地方)发生的一些涉及投票官员犯下重大错误的事件表明,这些来自社区的男性和女性的参与代表了一种挑战……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Dropbox Allocation and Use Among Georgia Voters in the 2020 Election Voter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting Can Election Administration Overcome the Effects of Restrictive State Voting Laws? Assessing Precinct Consolidation Strategies Through Simulation Optimization Does the Framing of Information Regarding Foreign Election Interference Matter? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1