Party Thresholds for Registration and Resources—Mechanical Hurdles or Promoting Genuine Political Discourse

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Election Law Journal Pub Date : 2016-03-04 DOI:10.1089/elj.2015.0339
KellyNorm
{"title":"Party Thresholds for Registration and Resources—Mechanical Hurdles or Promoting Genuine Political Discourse","authors":"KellyNorm","doi":"10.1089/elj.2015.0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Minimum membership thresholds are commonly used in democracies as a criterion for political party registration. These thresholds can have the empowering quality of showing a specified level of popular support for a party and/or its ideology, policies, or leader, but are often a simple mathematical test for a new party, without requirements for political activism or internal party democracy. Thresholds for registration, and/or for access to state resources, impact on the style and scope of political discourse in a democracy, and can also be used as a mechanism to limit political competition. This article provides an international focus centering on three countries. Two countries, Australia and New Zealand, are developed democracies with well-established regulatory regimes. The third country, Papua New Guinea, provides a contrast as a developing democracy attempting to strengthen its party system through regulation. The article provides a comparative analysis of the mechanical nature of membership ...","PeriodicalId":45644,"journal":{"name":"Election Law Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/elj.2015.0339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Election Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2015.0339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Minimum membership thresholds are commonly used in democracies as a criterion for political party registration. These thresholds can have the empowering quality of showing a specified level of popular support for a party and/or its ideology, policies, or leader, but are often a simple mathematical test for a new party, without requirements for political activism or internal party democracy. Thresholds for registration, and/or for access to state resources, impact on the style and scope of political discourse in a democracy, and can also be used as a mechanism to limit political competition. This article provides an international focus centering on three countries. Two countries, Australia and New Zealand, are developed democracies with well-established regulatory regimes. The third country, Papua New Guinea, provides a contrast as a developing democracy attempting to strengthen its party system through regulation. The article provides a comparative analysis of the mechanical nature of membership ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政党注册门槛与资源——机械障碍或推动真正的政治话语
摘要最低入党门槛是民主国家普遍采用的政党登记标准。这些门槛可以显示对一个政党和/或其意识形态、政策或领导人的特定程度的民众支持,但通常是对一个新政党的简单数学测试,不需要政治激进主义或党内民主。登记门槛和/或获得国家资源的门槛影响民主政治话语的风格和范围,也可以用作限制政治竞争的机制。这篇文章提供了一个以三个国家为中心的国际焦点。澳大利亚和新西兰这两个国家是发达的民主国家,拥有完善的监管制度。第三个国家巴布亚新几内亚形成了鲜明对比,它是一个发展中的民主国家,试图通过监管加强其政党制度。这篇文章对构件的力学性质进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Dropbox Allocation and Use Among Georgia Voters in the 2020 Election Voter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting Can Election Administration Overcome the Effects of Restrictive State Voting Laws? Assessing Precinct Consolidation Strategies Through Simulation Optimization Does the Framing of Information Regarding Foreign Election Interference Matter? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1