Maintaining soil productivity during forest or biomass-to-energy thinning harvests in the Western United States.

D. Page-Dumroese, M. Jurgensen, T. Terry
{"title":"Maintaining soil productivity during forest or biomass-to-energy thinning harvests in the Western United States.","authors":"D. Page-Dumroese, M. Jurgensen, T. Terry","doi":"10.1093/WJAF/25.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest biomass thinnings, to promote forest health or for energy production, can potentially impact the soil resource by altering soil physical, chemical, and/or biological properties. The extent and degree of impacts within a harvest unit or across a watershed will subsequently determine if site or soil productivity is affected. Although the impacts of stand removal on soil properties in the western United States have been documented, much less is known on periodic removals of biomass by thinnings or other partial cutting practices. However, basic recommendations and findings derived from stand-removal studies are also applicable to guide biomass thinnings for forest health, fuel reduction, or energy production. These are summarized as follows: (1) thinning operations are less likely to cause significant soil compaction than a stand-removal harvest, (2) risk-rating systems that evaluate soil susceptibility to compaction or nutrient losses from organic or mineral topsoil removal can help guide management practices, (3) using designated or existing harvesting traffic lanes and leaving some thinning residue in high traffic areas can reduce soil compaction on a stand basis, and (4) coarse-textured low fertility soils have greater risk of nutrient limitations resulting from whole-tree thinning removals than finer textured soils with higher fertility levels.","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"25 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/25.1.5","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/25.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

Forest biomass thinnings, to promote forest health or for energy production, can potentially impact the soil resource by altering soil physical, chemical, and/or biological properties. The extent and degree of impacts within a harvest unit or across a watershed will subsequently determine if site or soil productivity is affected. Although the impacts of stand removal on soil properties in the western United States have been documented, much less is known on periodic removals of biomass by thinnings or other partial cutting practices. However, basic recommendations and findings derived from stand-removal studies are also applicable to guide biomass thinnings for forest health, fuel reduction, or energy production. These are summarized as follows: (1) thinning operations are less likely to cause significant soil compaction than a stand-removal harvest, (2) risk-rating systems that evaluate soil susceptibility to compaction or nutrient losses from organic or mineral topsoil removal can help guide management practices, (3) using designated or existing harvesting traffic lanes and leaving some thinning residue in high traffic areas can reduce soil compaction on a stand basis, and (4) coarse-textured low fertility soils have greater risk of nutrient limitations resulting from whole-tree thinning removals than finer textured soils with higher fertility levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国西部森林或生物质能源间伐收获期间保持土壤生产力。
为促进森林健康或能源生产而进行的森林生物量减薄可通过改变土壤的物理、化学和/或生物特性而潜在地影响土壤资源。在收获单位内或跨越分水岭的影响范围和程度随后将决定场地或土壤生产力是否受到影响。尽管美国西部林分砍伐对土壤特性的影响已有文献记载,但通过疏林或其他部分砍伐的做法对生物质的周期性清除所知甚少。但是,从林分砍伐研究中得出的基本建议和结论也适用于指导生物量减薄以促进森林健康、减少燃料或能源生产。总结如下:(1)间伐作业不太可能造成明显的土壤压实,(2)评估土壤对有机或矿物表土去除造成的压实或养分损失的敏感性的风险评级系统可以帮助指导管理实践,(3)使用指定或现有的采伐交通车道,并在交通繁忙的地区留下一些间伐残留物,可以减少林分土壤压实。(4)质地粗、肥力低的土壤比质地细、肥力高的土壤更容易因整株间伐而产生养分限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Survival of Mountain Pine Beetle in Unpeeled Logs Productivity and soil properties 45 years after timber harvest and mechanical site preparation in western Montana Modeling the Transition from Juvenile to Mature Wood Using Modulus of Elasticity in Lodgepole Pine An Economic Assessment of Mountain Pine Beetle Timber Salvage in the West Field Note: Snow Damage Patterns in Maturing Mixed-Species Plantations of the Sierra Nevada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1