Relating Forest Attributes with Area- and Tree-Based Light Detection and Ranging Metrics for Western Oregon

Michael E. Goerndt, V. Monleon, H. Temesgen
{"title":"Relating Forest Attributes with Area- and Tree-Based Light Detection and Ranging Metrics for Western Oregon","authors":"Michael E. Goerndt, V. Monleon, H. Temesgen","doi":"10.1093/WJAF/25.3.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three sets of linear models were developed to predict several forest attributes, using stand-level and single-tree remote sensing (STRS) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) metrics as predictor variables. The first used only area-level metrics (ALM) associated with first-return height distribution, percentage of cover, and canopy transparency. The second alternative included metrics of first-return LiDAR intensity. The third alternative used area-level variables derived from STRS LiDAR metrics. The ALM model for Lorey’s height did not change with inclusion of intensity and yielded the best results in terms of both model fit (adjusted R 2 0.93) and cross-validated relative root mean squared error (RRMSE 8.1%). The ALM model for density (stems per hectare) had the poorest precision initially (RRMSE 39.3%), but it improved dramatically (RRMSE 27.2%) when intensity metrics were included. The resulting RRMSE values of the ALM models excluding intensity for basal area, quadratic mean diameter, cubic stem volume, and average crown width were 20.7, 19.9, 30.7, and 17.1%, respectively. The STRS model for Lorey’s height showed a 3% improvement in RRMSE over the ALM models. The STRS basal area and density models significantly underperformed compared with the ALM models, with RRMSE values of 31.6 and 47.2%, respectively. The performance of STRS models for crown width, volume, and quadratic mean diameter was comparable to that of the ALM models.","PeriodicalId":51220,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"25 1","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/WJAF/25.3.105","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/WJAF/25.3.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Three sets of linear models were developed to predict several forest attributes, using stand-level and single-tree remote sensing (STRS) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) metrics as predictor variables. The first used only area-level metrics (ALM) associated with first-return height distribution, percentage of cover, and canopy transparency. The second alternative included metrics of first-return LiDAR intensity. The third alternative used area-level variables derived from STRS LiDAR metrics. The ALM model for Lorey’s height did not change with inclusion of intensity and yielded the best results in terms of both model fit (adjusted R 2 0.93) and cross-validated relative root mean squared error (RRMSE 8.1%). The ALM model for density (stems per hectare) had the poorest precision initially (RRMSE 39.3%), but it improved dramatically (RRMSE 27.2%) when intensity metrics were included. The resulting RRMSE values of the ALM models excluding intensity for basal area, quadratic mean diameter, cubic stem volume, and average crown width were 20.7, 19.9, 30.7, and 17.1%, respectively. The STRS model for Lorey’s height showed a 3% improvement in RRMSE over the ALM models. The STRS basal area and density models significantly underperformed compared with the ALM models, with RRMSE values of 31.6 and 47.2%, respectively. The performance of STRS models for crown width, volume, and quadratic mean diameter was comparable to that of the ALM models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将森林属性与西部俄勒冈州基于区域和树木的光检测和测距指标相关联
以林分水平和单树遥感(STRS)光探测和测距(LiDAR)指标为预测变量,建立了3组线性模型来预测几种森林属性。第一种方法只使用与首次返回高度分布、覆盖百分比和树冠透明度相关的面积级度量(ALM)。第二种方案包括首回激光雷达强度指标。第三种方案使用了来自STRS激光雷达指标的区域级变量。Lorey’s height的ALM模型没有随着强度的增加而改变,并且在模型拟合(调整后的r0.93)和交叉验证的相对均方根误差(RRMSE 8.1%)方面都获得了最好的结果。密度(每公顷茎数)的ALM模型最初精度最差(RRMSE为39.3%),但当包括强度指标时,它显著提高(RRMSE为27.2%)。排除基面积、二次平均直径、立方茎体积和平均冠宽强度后,ALM模型的RRMSE值分别为20.7、19.9、30.7和17.1%。Lorey’s身高的STRS模型在RRMSE上比ALM模型提高了3%。STRS基础面积和密度模型的RRMSE值分别为31.6和47.2%,显著低于ALM模型。STRS模型在冠宽、体积和二次平均直径方面的性能与ALM模型相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Survival of Mountain Pine Beetle in Unpeeled Logs Productivity and soil properties 45 years after timber harvest and mechanical site preparation in western Montana Modeling the Transition from Juvenile to Mature Wood Using Modulus of Elasticity in Lodgepole Pine An Economic Assessment of Mountain Pine Beetle Timber Salvage in the West Field Note: Snow Damage Patterns in Maturing Mixed-Species Plantations of the Sierra Nevada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1