Unifying system identification and biomechanical formulations for the estimation of muscle, tendon and joint stiffness during human movement

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1088/2516-1091/ac12c4
Christopher P. Cop, G. Cavallo, R. C. van 't Veld, Bart FJM Koopman, J. Lataire, A. Schouten, Massimo Sartori
{"title":"Unifying system identification and biomechanical formulations for the estimation of muscle, tendon and joint stiffness during human movement","authors":"Christopher P. Cop, G. Cavallo, R. C. van 't Veld, Bart FJM Koopman, J. Lataire, A. Schouten, Massimo Sartori","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/ac12c4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vivo joint stiffness estimation during time-varying conditions remains an open challenge. Multiple communities, e.g. system identification and biomechanics, have tackled the problem from different perspectives and using different methods, each of which entailing advantages and limitations, often complementary. System identification formulations provide data-driven estimates of stiffness at the joint level, while biomechanics often relies on musculoskeletal models to estimate stiffness at multiple levels, i.e. joint, muscle, and tendon. Collaboration across these two scientific communities seems to be a logical step toward a reliable multi-level understanding of joint stiffness. However, differences at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels have limited inter-community interaction. In this article we present a roadmap to achieve a unified framework for the estimation of time-varying stiffness in the composite human neuromusculoskeletal system during movement. We present our perspective on future developments to obtain data-driven system identification and musculoskeletal models that are compatible at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels. Moreover, we propose a novel combined closed-loop paradigm, in which reference estimates of joint stiffness via system identification are decomposed into underlying muscle and tendon contribution via high-density-electromyography-driven musculoskeletal modeling. We highlight the need for aligning experimental requirements to be able to compare both joint stiffness formulations. Unifying both biomechanics’ and system identification’s formulations is a necessary step for truly generalizing stiffness estimation across individuals, movement conditions, training and impairment levels. From an application point of view, this is central for enabling patient-specific neurorehabilitation therapies, as well as biomimetic control of assistive robotic technologies. The roadmap we propose could serve as an inspiration for future collaborations across broadly different scientific communities to truly understand joint stiffness bio- and neuromechanics. Video Abstract: Unifying system identification and biomechanical formulations for the estimation of muscle, tendon and joint stiffness during human movement","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac12c4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In vivo joint stiffness estimation during time-varying conditions remains an open challenge. Multiple communities, e.g. system identification and biomechanics, have tackled the problem from different perspectives and using different methods, each of which entailing advantages and limitations, often complementary. System identification formulations provide data-driven estimates of stiffness at the joint level, while biomechanics often relies on musculoskeletal models to estimate stiffness at multiple levels, i.e. joint, muscle, and tendon. Collaboration across these two scientific communities seems to be a logical step toward a reliable multi-level understanding of joint stiffness. However, differences at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels have limited inter-community interaction. In this article we present a roadmap to achieve a unified framework for the estimation of time-varying stiffness in the composite human neuromusculoskeletal system during movement. We present our perspective on future developments to obtain data-driven system identification and musculoskeletal models that are compatible at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels. Moreover, we propose a novel combined closed-loop paradigm, in which reference estimates of joint stiffness via system identification are decomposed into underlying muscle and tendon contribution via high-density-electromyography-driven musculoskeletal modeling. We highlight the need for aligning experimental requirements to be able to compare both joint stiffness formulations. Unifying both biomechanics’ and system identification’s formulations is a necessary step for truly generalizing stiffness estimation across individuals, movement conditions, training and impairment levels. From an application point of view, this is central for enabling patient-specific neurorehabilitation therapies, as well as biomimetic control of assistive robotic technologies. The roadmap we propose could serve as an inspiration for future collaborations across broadly different scientific communities to truly understand joint stiffness bio- and neuromechanics. Video Abstract: Unifying system identification and biomechanical formulations for the estimation of muscle, tendon and joint stiffness during human movement
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统一系统识别和生物力学公式估计肌肉,肌腱和关节刚度在人体运动
在时变条件下的体内关节刚度估计仍然是一个开放的挑战。多个社区,如系统识别和生物力学,从不同的角度和使用不同的方法来解决问题,每种方法都有优点和局限性,往往是互补的。系统识别公式提供关节水平刚度的数据驱动估计,而生物力学通常依赖于肌肉骨骼模型来估计多个水平的刚度,即关节、肌肉和肌腱。这两个科学团体之间的合作似乎是迈向可靠的多层次理解关节刚度的合乎逻辑的一步。然而,理论、计算和实验水平的差异限制了社区间的互动。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个路线图,以实现一个统一的框架估计时变刚度在复合人体神经肌肉骨骼系统在运动过程中。我们提出了我们对未来发展的看法,以获得在理论、计算和实验水平上兼容的数据驱动系统识别和肌肉骨骼模型。此外,我们提出了一种新的联合闭环模式,其中通过系统识别对关节刚度的参考估计通过高密度肌电图驱动的肌肉骨骼模型分解为潜在肌肉和肌腱的贡献。我们强调需要调整实验要求,以便能够比较两种关节刚度公式。统一生物力学和系统识别的公式是在个体、运动条件、训练和损伤水平之间真正推广刚度估计的必要步骤。从应用的角度来看,这对于实现患者特异性神经康复治疗以及辅助机器人技术的仿生控制至关重要。我们提出的路线图可以作为未来在广泛不同的科学界合作的灵感,以真正理解关节刚度生物和神经力学。视频摘要:统一系统识别和生物力学公式,用于估计人体运动过程中肌肉、肌腱和关节的刚度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of bioengineered 3D patient derived breast cancer organoid model focusing dynamic fibroblast-stem cell reciprocity. Biomedical applications of the engineered AIEgen-lipid nanostructurein vitroandin vivo. Cell stretching devices integrated with live cell imaging: a powerful approach to study how cells react to mechanical cues. Mathematical models on bone cell homeostasis and kinetics in the presence of electric fields: a review. A review of computational optimization of bone scaffold architecture: methods, challenges, and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1