Engineering bone from fat: a review of thein vivomechanisms of adipose derived stem cell-mediated bone regeneration.

IF 7.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2021-08-09 DOI:10.1088/2516-1091/ac1522
Allison L Horenberg, Alexandra N Rindone, Warren L Grayson
{"title":"Engineering bone from fat: a review of the<i>in vivo</i>mechanisms of adipose derived stem cell-mediated bone regeneration.","authors":"Allison L Horenberg, Alexandra N Rindone, Warren L Grayson","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/ac1522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) have considerable potential to promote bone regeneration due to their ease of isolation, abundance, and osteogenic capacity. However, despite two decades of research, studies of the precise mechanisms underlying their<i>in vivo</i>osteo-regenerative capacity remain contradictory. Specifically, there are multiple reports that suggest either a direct mechanism (i.e. ASCs directly differentiate into osteoblasts and lay done new bone matrix) or an indirect mechanism (i.e. ASCs stimulate endogenous cells via their secretory profiles) of bone regeneration. To address this discrepancy we critically reviewed studies utilizing ASCs for<i>in vivo</i>bone regeneration and employed methods to track cell fate. We evaluated the rigor of individual studies by examining the specific defect and animal models employed, cell sorting or pretreatment methods, and quantitative assessments of cell dosing and cell survival/distribution data to determine the strength of their claims. There is robust evidence to support both a direct differentiation of ASCs and indirect signaling based on secreted factors: osteogenic/angiogenic, immunomodulatory, or extracellular matrix factors, suggesting that a combination of factors underlie the pro-regenerative capacity of ASCs. However, there remains significant knowledge gaps regarding the precise efficiency of ASC engraftment following transplantation, the types of spatiotemporal interactions that occur between ASCs and host cells during the different stages of healing, and the contributions of osteoclasts, nerves, and immune cells to ASC-mediated regeneration. Emerging technologies will enable further elucidation of the specific mechanisms of action of ASCs in bone regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac1522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) have considerable potential to promote bone regeneration due to their ease of isolation, abundance, and osteogenic capacity. However, despite two decades of research, studies of the precise mechanisms underlying theirin vivoosteo-regenerative capacity remain contradictory. Specifically, there are multiple reports that suggest either a direct mechanism (i.e. ASCs directly differentiate into osteoblasts and lay done new bone matrix) or an indirect mechanism (i.e. ASCs stimulate endogenous cells via their secretory profiles) of bone regeneration. To address this discrepancy we critically reviewed studies utilizing ASCs forin vivobone regeneration and employed methods to track cell fate. We evaluated the rigor of individual studies by examining the specific defect and animal models employed, cell sorting or pretreatment methods, and quantitative assessments of cell dosing and cell survival/distribution data to determine the strength of their claims. There is robust evidence to support both a direct differentiation of ASCs and indirect signaling based on secreted factors: osteogenic/angiogenic, immunomodulatory, or extracellular matrix factors, suggesting that a combination of factors underlie the pro-regenerative capacity of ASCs. However, there remains significant knowledge gaps regarding the precise efficiency of ASC engraftment following transplantation, the types of spatiotemporal interactions that occur between ASCs and host cells during the different stages of healing, and the contributions of osteoclasts, nerves, and immune cells to ASC-mediated regeneration. Emerging technologies will enable further elucidation of the specific mechanisms of action of ASCs in bone regeneration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂肪工程骨:脂肪源性干细胞介导骨再生的内在机制综述。
脂肪源性基质/干细胞(ASCs)由于其易于分离、丰富和成骨能力,具有促进骨再生的巨大潜力。然而,尽管经过了二十年的研究,对其体内再生能力的精确机制的研究仍然存在矛盾。具体来说,有多篇报道表明,骨再生的直接机制(即ASCs直接分化成成骨细胞并形成新的骨基质)或间接机制(即ASCs通过其分泌特征刺激内源性细胞)。为了解决这一差异,我们批判性地回顾了利用ASCs进行人体内再生的研究,并采用了跟踪细胞命运的方法。我们通过检查特定缺陷和使用的动物模型、细胞分选或预处理方法、细胞剂量和细胞存活/分布数据的定量评估来评估个体研究的严谨性,以确定其主张的强度。有强有力的证据支持ASCs的直接分化和基于分泌因子(成骨/血管生成、免疫调节或细胞外基质因子)的间接信号传导,这表明ASCs的促再生能力是多种因素共同作用的结果。然而,关于移植后ASC植入的精确效率,ASC与宿主细胞在不同愈合阶段发生的时空相互作用类型,破骨细胞,神经和免疫细胞对ASC介导的再生的贡献,仍然存在显着的知识空白。新兴技术将进一步阐明ASCs在骨再生中的具体作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Motion perception with visual prostheses. Trustworthy AI in digital health: a comprehensive review of robustness and explainability. Resonant frequencies of human organs, tissues, and body parts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Engineered surfaces for biomedical implants: advances in coatings, materials, and techniques. Navigation Paradigms for Non-invasive BCI-controlled Wheelchairs: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1