Education for Individual Fulfilment as Social: Grappling with Obstructions to Growth

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1093/jopedu/qhad028
Sheron Fraser-Burgess
{"title":"Education for Individual Fulfilment as Social: Grappling with Obstructions to Growth","authors":"Sheron Fraser-Burgess","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In placing education at the centre, as The Main Enterprise of the World, Philip Kitcher has undertaken a monumental task. He has come to the field of philosophy of education captivated by the importance of its substantive preoccupations for the advancement of democratic aims. Accordingly, his book argues that the most salient obstruction to preparing citizens who will contribute to society is the seeming irreconcilability of the demands of industry, on the one hand, and of students’ personal growth, on the other. In spite of his desire to accommodate diverse accounts of the human good, and his recognition of the formative role of culture, broadly conceived, there are strains in his account of human fulfilment deriving from the disjunction of the self and others. It is not evident, on his Deweyan onto-epistemology, that there is adequate attention to the imprint on an individual and on the beliefs they come to form of proximal social groups. The nature of the balance between ‘in group’ and ‘out group’ influences, between those that are near and those that are far, can profoundly affect the plausibility of Kitcher’s account of a socially based sense of fulfilment.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In placing education at the centre, as The Main Enterprise of the World, Philip Kitcher has undertaken a monumental task. He has come to the field of philosophy of education captivated by the importance of its substantive preoccupations for the advancement of democratic aims. Accordingly, his book argues that the most salient obstruction to preparing citizens who will contribute to society is the seeming irreconcilability of the demands of industry, on the one hand, and of students’ personal growth, on the other. In spite of his desire to accommodate diverse accounts of the human good, and his recognition of the formative role of culture, broadly conceived, there are strains in his account of human fulfilment deriving from the disjunction of the self and others. It is not evident, on his Deweyan onto-epistemology, that there is adequate attention to the imprint on an individual and on the beliefs they come to form of proximal social groups. The nature of the balance between ‘in group’ and ‘out group’ influences, between those that are near and those that are far, can profoundly affect the plausibility of Kitcher’s account of a socially based sense of fulfilment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为社会的个人成就教育:克服成长障碍
菲利普·基彻把教育作为世界的主要事业放在中心位置,这是一项艰巨的任务。他进入教育哲学领域,被其实质性关注对推进民主目标的重要性所吸引。因此,他的书认为,培养对社会有贡献的公民的最显著障碍是,一方面,工业的要求与另一方面,学生的个人成长的要求似乎是不可调和的。尽管他渴望容纳人类善的各种说法,并且他承认文化的形成作用,从广义上讲,在他对人类成就的描述中,有来自自我和他人分离的紧张。在他的杜威论-认识论中,并没有很明显地注意到,在个人身上的印记,以及他们形成的近端社会群体的信仰。在“群体内”和“群体外”的影响之间,在那些近的和那些远的影响之间,平衡的本质可以深刻地影响基彻关于基于社会的满足感的描述的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Journal of Philosophy of Education publishes articles representing a wide variety of philosophical traditions. They vary from examination of fundamental philosophical issues in their connection with education, to detailed critical engagement with current educational practice or policy from a philosophical point of view. The journal aims to promote rigorous thinking on educational matters and to identify and criticise the ideological forces shaping education. Ethical, political, aesthetic and epistemological dimensions of educational theory are amongst those covered.
期刊最新文献
Cultivating a Capability for Empathy in the Bologna System – The Shortcomings of an Economical Approach to Education and the Importance of the Civil “The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory”, Christopher Martin, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2022, 252 pages, $74.00, ISBN: 9780197612910 Correction to ‘The Gender Wars, Academic Freedom and Education’ by Judith Suissa and Alice Sullivan (2021) Teaching and knowledge: uneasy bedfellows Finding One’s Way: A Response to the Idea of an Education after Progress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1