'People are fed up; don't mess with them.' Non-quantificational Arguments and Polarity Reversals

IF 2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Semantics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jos/ffac006
Gennaro Chierchia
{"title":"'People are fed up; don't mess with them.' Non-quantificational Arguments and Polarity Reversals","authors":"Gennaro Chierchia","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffac006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The first sentence in the title means roughly: All the people around are tired. The second means: Do not mess with any of them. Even though the second sentence looks just like a negative counterpart of the first, it doesn’t have the expected compositional meaning: it doesn’t mean “do not mess with all the people”. This phenomenon is extremely general. It takes place with Bare Plurals, as in the title. It figures prominently in the behavior of Plural Definites ( I spoke to the students in trouble @ \" / I didn’t speak to the students in trouble @ ¬ $ ). It also takes place with to Donkey pronouns ( Every farmer who had a donkey sold it @ \" / No man who had a donkey sold it @ ¬ $ ). These switches of quantificational force under polarity reversals calls to mind Free Choice phenomena. In particular, a determiner like any is interpreted as a narrow scope existential in a sentence like I didn’t talk to any student in trouble @ ¬ $ ; however, in positive environments, the existential meaning of any emerges as strengthened to universal I spoke to any student in trouble @ \" . It is tempting to conjecture that the source of this uniform behavior is a uniform mechanism. While these constructions (Free Choice any , Bare Plurals, Plural Definites, and Donkey pronouns) have been studied extensively, and insightful approaches to Plural Definites in terms of Free Choice mechanisms have also been proposed (Bar Lev 2018, 2021), a unitary analysis has not been attempted to the best of my knowledge. In spite of the many challenges that a unified analysis faces, it is worth a try, for, if successful, it would considerably push forward our understanding of a wide range of very diverse constructions.","PeriodicalId":46947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Semantics","volume":"39 1","pages":"475-521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The first sentence in the title means roughly: All the people around are tired. The second means: Do not mess with any of them. Even though the second sentence looks just like a negative counterpart of the first, it doesn’t have the expected compositional meaning: it doesn’t mean “do not mess with all the people”. This phenomenon is extremely general. It takes place with Bare Plurals, as in the title. It figures prominently in the behavior of Plural Definites ( I spoke to the students in trouble @ " / I didn’t speak to the students in trouble @ ¬ $ ). It also takes place with to Donkey pronouns ( Every farmer who had a donkey sold it @ " / No man who had a donkey sold it @ ¬ $ ). These switches of quantificational force under polarity reversals calls to mind Free Choice phenomena. In particular, a determiner like any is interpreted as a narrow scope existential in a sentence like I didn’t talk to any student in trouble @ ¬ $ ; however, in positive environments, the existential meaning of any emerges as strengthened to universal I spoke to any student in trouble @ " . It is tempting to conjecture that the source of this uniform behavior is a uniform mechanism. While these constructions (Free Choice any , Bare Plurals, Plural Definites, and Donkey pronouns) have been studied extensively, and insightful approaches to Plural Definites in terms of Free Choice mechanisms have also been proposed (Bar Lev 2018, 2021), a unitary analysis has not been attempted to the best of my knowledge. In spite of the many challenges that a unified analysis faces, it is worth a try, for, if successful, it would considerably push forward our understanding of a wide range of very diverse constructions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“人们受够了;别惹他们。”非量化参数和极性反转
标题中的第一句话大致意思是:周围的人都累了。第二个意思是:不要惹他们中的任何一个。尽管第二句话看起来就像第一句的否定版,但它并没有预期的构成意义:它的意思并不是“不要惹所有的人”。这种现象极为普遍。它以裸复数形式出现,如标题。它在复数定义的行为中表现得很突出(我和有麻烦的学生说话@”/我没有和有麻烦的学生说话@¬$)。它也发生在to Donkey代词(每个有驴的农民都卖了它@”/没有人有驴卖了它@¬$)。这些在极性反转下定量力的转换让人想起自由选择现象。特别地,像any这样的限定词在句子中被解释为狭窄范围的存在,比如我没有和任何有麻烦的学生交谈@¬$;然而,在积极的环境中,any的存在意义被强化为普遍存在,我和任何有困难的学生交谈过@”。人们很容易猜测,这种统一行为的来源是一种统一的机制。虽然这些结构(Free Choice any, Bare Plurals,复数定义项和Donkey pronouns)已经被广泛研究,并且也提出了关于自由选择机制的复数定义项的有见地的方法(Bar Lev 2018, 2021),但据我所知,还没有尝试过一个统一的分析。尽管统一分析面临许多挑战,但值得一试,因为,如果成功,它将大大推动我们对各种各样的结构的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Journal of Semantics aims to be the premier journal in semantics. It covers all areas in the study of meaning, with a focus on formal and experimental methods. The Journal welcomes submissions on semantics, pragmatics, the syntax/semantics interface, cross-linguistic semantics, experimental studies of meaning (processing, acquisition, neurolinguistics), and semantically informed philosophy of language.
期刊最新文献
Russian Disjunction To li To li and Obligatory Ignorance The Interpretation of Relative and Absolute Adjectives Under Negation X- vs. O-marked want Negative strengthening: The interplay of evaluative polarity and scale structure The Domains of Monotonicity Processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1