Infertility treatment decision-making in Ghana and contestations that may arise: a prospective sociological study

R. A. Hiadzi, B. Woodward
{"title":"Infertility treatment decision-making in Ghana and contestations that may arise: a prospective sociological study","authors":"R. A. Hiadzi, B. Woodward","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to explore contestations within infertile couples seeking infertility therapy in a sub-Saharan society. Their views regarding infertility treatment were explored, including their arguments for or against different treatment options. The effects of the contributions of the various partners were analyzed. Material and methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with people seeking infertility treatment at 3 different fertility clinics in Accra, Ghana. Participants were restricted to 45 persons from married heterosexual couples, with 15 respondents (5 male and 10 female) from each setting. Respondents were asked questions relating to the decision-making process toward seeking treatment and the reactions of their partners. Results: Contestations tended to relate to 5 main themes: the cause of the infertility and who was to blame; male apathy; reluctance to provide semen samples for evaluation; an absentee husband due to work pressure; and finance relating to the cost of infertility treatment. Discussion: This is the first study to highlight the contestations that arise between couples regarding their decision-making about alleviating their infertility via 3 different types of fertility clinics in Accra, Ghana. It is apparent that globalization and changing norms of family life have to a large extent, accounted for the changing ideas and practices surrounding infertility in urban Ghana.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"64 13 1","pages":"e32 - e32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000032","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore contestations within infertile couples seeking infertility therapy in a sub-Saharan society. Their views regarding infertility treatment were explored, including their arguments for or against different treatment options. The effects of the contributions of the various partners were analyzed. Material and methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with people seeking infertility treatment at 3 different fertility clinics in Accra, Ghana. Participants were restricted to 45 persons from married heterosexual couples, with 15 respondents (5 male and 10 female) from each setting. Respondents were asked questions relating to the decision-making process toward seeking treatment and the reactions of their partners. Results: Contestations tended to relate to 5 main themes: the cause of the infertility and who was to blame; male apathy; reluctance to provide semen samples for evaluation; an absentee husband due to work pressure; and finance relating to the cost of infertility treatment. Discussion: This is the first study to highlight the contestations that arise between couples regarding their decision-making about alleviating their infertility via 3 different types of fertility clinics in Accra, Ghana. It is apparent that globalization and changing norms of family life have to a large extent, accounted for the changing ideas and practices surrounding infertility in urban Ghana.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳的不孕症治疗决策和可能出现的争论:一项前瞻性社会学研究
本研究旨在探讨在撒哈拉以南地区寻求不孕症治疗的不孕夫妇之间的争论。他们对不孕症治疗的看法进行了探讨,包括他们对不同治疗方案的支持或反对。分析了各合作伙伴贡献的影响。材料和方法:对在加纳阿克拉3家不同的生育诊所寻求不孕症治疗的人进行了半结构化的深度访谈。参与者被限制为来自已婚异性恋夫妇的45人,每个群体有15名受访者(5男10女)。受访者被问及与寻求治疗的决策过程及其伴侣的反应有关的问题。结果:争议主要涉及5个主题:不孕症的原因和责任;男冷漠;不愿提供精液样本供评估;丈夫因工作压力不在家;以及与不孕不育治疗费用相关的资金。讨论:这是第一项通过加纳阿克拉3家不同类型的生育诊所强调夫妇之间关于减轻不孕症决策的争论的研究。显然,全球化和家庭生活规范的变化在很大程度上解释了加纳城市中围绕不孕症的观念和做法的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advantages of cryopreservation for fertility preservation due to age-related fertility loss Male factor infertility and implication of fertility treatment in low resource settings Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study Prognostic value of a serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff, twelve days after fresh embryo transfer, on predicting live birth among Ugandan women The fertility care gap in the Global South: lessons from The Gambia, West Africa, and ways forward to establish fertility care for all
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1