Mass elevation effect and continentality have a stronger impact on global treelines than spatial isolation

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1111/geb.13689
David R. Kienle, Severin D. H. Irl, Carl Beierkuhnlein
{"title":"Mass elevation effect and continentality have a stronger impact on global treelines than spatial isolation","authors":"David R. Kienle,&nbsp;Severin D. H. Irl,&nbsp;Carl Beierkuhnlein","doi":"10.1111/geb.13689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The global relationship between treeline elevation and temperature (or latitude as a proxy) is well established. However, additional large-scale and regional abiotic influences such as mass elevation effect (MEE), continentality and isolation are superimposed onto the latitude-treeline relationship. To quantify these effects, we apply globally applicable measures and test the effects of MEE, an aspect of continental climate and isolation on treeline elevation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global treeline elevations (<i>n</i> = 629).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We sampled treeline sites using earth observation. We calculated MEE as the distance to the nearest mountain chain limits. Continentality was assessed by the distance to the nearest coastline. Isolation was calculated by the nearest distance of a mountain chain to another mountain chain within a comparable elevational band.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The global latitudinal pattern showed a distinct bimodal latitude-treeline elevation relationship. Treeline elevations increased substantially with increased MEE and distance to coastlines while isolation even decreased treeline elevations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study shows a globally consistent effect of MEE and distance to the coastline on treeline elevation, contributing to our basic understanding of large-scale biogeographic processes governing treeline formation. MEE and continentality reduce cloudiness and increase solar radiation, resulting in higher treeline elevations. Isolation effects are not consistent and may be influenced by immigration and speciation. Understanding global treeline formation using comprehensive measures contributes to a better understanding of how environmental conditions determine vegetation boundaries at large spatial scales.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"32 7","pages":"1087-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13689","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim

The global relationship between treeline elevation and temperature (or latitude as a proxy) is well established. However, additional large-scale and regional abiotic influences such as mass elevation effect (MEE), continentality and isolation are superimposed onto the latitude-treeline relationship. To quantify these effects, we apply globally applicable measures and test the effects of MEE, an aspect of continental climate and isolation on treeline elevation.

Location

Global treeline elevations (n = 629).

Methods

We sampled treeline sites using earth observation. We calculated MEE as the distance to the nearest mountain chain limits. Continentality was assessed by the distance to the nearest coastline. Isolation was calculated by the nearest distance of a mountain chain to another mountain chain within a comparable elevational band.

Results

The global latitudinal pattern showed a distinct bimodal latitude-treeline elevation relationship. Treeline elevations increased substantially with increased MEE and distance to coastlines while isolation even decreased treeline elevations.

Main Conclusions

Our study shows a globally consistent effect of MEE and distance to the coastline on treeline elevation, contributing to our basic understanding of large-scale biogeographic processes governing treeline formation. MEE and continentality reduce cloudiness and increase solar radiation, resulting in higher treeline elevations. Isolation effects are not consistent and may be influenced by immigration and speciation. Understanding global treeline formation using comprehensive measures contributes to a better understanding of how environmental conditions determine vegetation boundaries at large spatial scales.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质量高程效应和大陆性对全球树线的影响大于空间隔离
目的全球树木线高程与温度(或纬度作为代理)之间的关系已经建立。然而,额外的大尺度和区域非生物影响,如质量海拔效应(MEE)、大陆性和孤立性叠加在纬度-树线关系上。为了量化这些影响,我们采用了全球适用的措施,并测试了MEE的影响,MEE是大陆气候和隔离对树线海拔的一个方面。全球树线海拔(n = 629)。方法利用对地观测对林木线样点进行采样。我们将MEE计算为到最近的山脉极限的距离。大陆性是根据到最近海岸线的距离来评估的。隔离是根据一个山脉与另一个山脉在相当海拔带内的最近距离来计算的。结果全球纬度格局表现出明显的双峰纬度-树线高程关系。随着生态环境指数的增加和距离海岸线的距离的增加,树线高度大幅增加,而隔离甚至降低了树线高度。研究结果表明,生态环境指数和到海岸线的距离对树线高程的影响在全球范围内是一致的,有助于我们对控制树线形成的大尺度生物地理过程有基本的认识。MEE和大陆性减少云量和增加太阳辐射,导致更高的树线海拔。隔离效应并不一致,可能受到迁移和物种形成的影响。利用综合措施了解全球树线的形成有助于更好地理解环境条件如何在大空间尺度上决定植被边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Fine-Grain Predictions Are Key to Accurately Represent Continental-Scale Biodiversity Patterns Issue Information Thermal Forcing Versus Chilling? Misspecification of Temperature Controls in Spring Phenology Models Predicting Landscape Conversion Impact on Small Mammal Occurrence and the Transmission of Parasites in the Atlantic Forest Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1