Zachary J. Gold, Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Tyler K. Refsland, Romina J. Andrioli, Marlin L. Bowles, Dale G. Brockway, Neil Burrows, Augusto C. Franco, Steve W. Hallgren, Sarah E. Hobbie, William A. Hoffmann, Kevin P. Kirkman, Peter B. Reich, Patrice Savadogo, Divino Silvério, Kirsten Stephan, Tercia Strydom, J. Morgan Varner, Dale D. Wade, Allan Wills, A. Carla Staver
{"title":"Herbaceous vegetation responses to experimental fire in savannas and forests depend on biome and climate","authors":"Zachary J. Gold, Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Tyler K. Refsland, Romina J. Andrioli, Marlin L. Bowles, Dale G. Brockway, Neil Burrows, Augusto C. Franco, Steve W. Hallgren, Sarah E. Hobbie, William A. Hoffmann, Kevin P. Kirkman, Peter B. Reich, Patrice Savadogo, Divino Silvério, Kirsten Stephan, Tercia Strydom, J. Morgan Varner, Dale D. Wade, Allan Wills, A. Carla Staver","doi":"10.1111/ele.14236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fire-vegetation feedbacks potentially maintain global savanna and forest distributions. Accordingly, vegetation in savanna and forest ecosystems should have differential responses to fire, but fire response data for herbaceous vegetation have yet to be synthesized across biomes. Here, we examined herbaceous vegetation responses to experimental fire at 30 sites spanning four continents. Across a variety of metrics, herbaceous vegetation increased in abundance where fire was applied, with larger responses to fire in wetter and in cooler and/or less seasonal systems. Compared to forests, savannas were associated with a 4.8 (±0.4) times larger difference in herbaceous vegetation abundance for burned versus unburned plots. In particular, grass cover decreased with fire exclusion in savannas, largely via decreases in C4 grass cover, whereas changes in fire frequency had a relatively weak effect on grass cover in forests. These differential responses underscore the importance of fire for maintaining the vegetation structure of savannas and forests.","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"26 7","pages":"1237-1246"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fire-vegetation feedbacks potentially maintain global savanna and forest distributions. Accordingly, vegetation in savanna and forest ecosystems should have differential responses to fire, but fire response data for herbaceous vegetation have yet to be synthesized across biomes. Here, we examined herbaceous vegetation responses to experimental fire at 30 sites spanning four continents. Across a variety of metrics, herbaceous vegetation increased in abundance where fire was applied, with larger responses to fire in wetter and in cooler and/or less seasonal systems. Compared to forests, savannas were associated with a 4.8 (±0.4) times larger difference in herbaceous vegetation abundance for burned versus unburned plots. In particular, grass cover decreased with fire exclusion in savannas, largely via decreases in C4 grass cover, whereas changes in fire frequency had a relatively weak effect on grass cover in forests. These differential responses underscore the importance of fire for maintaining the vegetation structure of savannas and forests.
期刊介绍:
Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.