Gender differences in academic careers: Evidence for a Dutch university from personnel data 1990-2006

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT Equality Diversity and Inclusion Pub Date : 2012-09-14 DOI:10.1108/02610151211263487
S. Groeneveld, K. Tijdens, D. V. Kleef
{"title":"Gender differences in academic careers: Evidence for a Dutch university from personnel data 1990-2006","authors":"S. Groeneveld, K. Tijdens, D. V. Kleef","doi":"10.1108/02610151211263487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine gender differences in promotion probabilities of the academic staff of a large university in The Netherlands, taking into account the sex segregated context of the faculty.Design/methodology/approach – The study uses records of the university's personnel information system from 1990 to 2006, covering the data of 1,792 employees in the academic ranks who have entered since 1990. Cox regression models are used to test three hypotheses.Findings – The findings show that women have lower promotion probabilities than men. The gender differences are primarily explained by differences in years of service and external mobility, and not by the sex segregated context of the faculty. A higher share of women decreases the odds of being promoted for both men and women. Gender differences in working hours do not explain the gender differences in promotion probabilities.Originality/value – The paper adds to the existing literature because event history analyses have hardl...","PeriodicalId":46962,"journal":{"name":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","volume":"31 1","pages":"646-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02610151211263487","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211263487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine gender differences in promotion probabilities of the academic staff of a large university in The Netherlands, taking into account the sex segregated context of the faculty.Design/methodology/approach – The study uses records of the university's personnel information system from 1990 to 2006, covering the data of 1,792 employees in the academic ranks who have entered since 1990. Cox regression models are used to test three hypotheses.Findings – The findings show that women have lower promotion probabilities than men. The gender differences are primarily explained by differences in years of service and external mobility, and not by the sex segregated context of the faculty. A higher share of women decreases the odds of being promoted for both men and women. Gender differences in working hours do not explain the gender differences in promotion probabilities.Originality/value – The paper adds to the existing literature because event history analyses have hardl...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术生涯中的性别差异:一所荷兰大学1990-2006年人事数据的证据
目的-本文的目的是研究荷兰一所大型大学学术人员晋升概率的性别差异,同时考虑到教师的性别隔离背景。设计/方法/方法-该研究使用了1990年至2006年大学人事信息系统的记录,涵盖了自1990年以来入职的1,792名学术级别员工的数据。采用Cox回归模型对三个假设进行检验。调查结果:调查结果显示,女性的晋升几率低于男性。性别差异主要是由服务年限和外部流动性的差异来解释的,而不是由教员的性别隔离环境来解释的。较高的女性比例降低了男性和女性获得晋升的几率。工作时间的性别差异并不能解释晋升概率的性别差异。原创性/价值-这篇论文增加了现有的文献,因为事件历史分析很难…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
The Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces scale: a preliminary validation of the questionnaire Hope theory as resistance: narratives of South Asian scholars in Australian academia Coping techniques and strategies for pursuing anti-racism within academe: a collective autoethnographic account from minoritised academics in the UK Covering Número 85: a content analysis and critical race theory perspective Addressing the challenge of engaging in paid work while undertaking unpaid caring: insights for improving employment inclusion of young carers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1