The adverse effect of materialism on employee engagement in China

Tian Xie, Yanbin Shi, Jing Zhou
{"title":"The adverse effect of materialism on employee engagement in China","authors":"Tian Xie, Yanbin Shi, Jing Zhou","doi":"10.1108/JCHRM-07-2016-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this study was to explore the influence of materialism on employee engagement in China. Mediating role of employees’ autonomy need satisfaction in workplace was also examined. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nData were collected from 217 employees from various companies located across 19 provinces and towns in China. These participants completed three self-report scales, including materialistic values, employee engagement and autonomy need satisfaction at work. Pearson correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling were used to analyze data. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nResults revealed that as hypothesized, autonomy need satisfaction at work fully mediated the effects of materialism on employee engagement. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe study was limited by identifying the measure of materialism that is not robust at an organizational and national level. Similarly, lack of existing literature including use of cross-sectional research design around materialism also added to the limitations of this study. Limitations aside, the current study suggests that increasing materialism within Chinese organizations is likely to exert potentially significant adverse effects on employee engagement and, hence, the overall quality of work. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe current study has empirically discovered a possible relationship between materialism and employee engagement, which is rarely examined in previous studies. In addition, the study also proposes a psychological mechanism through which materialistic values can influence employee engagement. The findings are practically important to human resource management practices in China and theoretically important for the exploration of antecedents of employee engagement.","PeriodicalId":54013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"100-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCHRM-07-2016-0013","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHRM-07-2016-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of materialism on employee engagement in China. Mediating role of employees’ autonomy need satisfaction in workplace was also examined. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 217 employees from various companies located across 19 provinces and towns in China. These participants completed three self-report scales, including materialistic values, employee engagement and autonomy need satisfaction at work. Pearson correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling were used to analyze data. Findings Results revealed that as hypothesized, autonomy need satisfaction at work fully mediated the effects of materialism on employee engagement. Research limitations/implications The study was limited by identifying the measure of materialism that is not robust at an organizational and national level. Similarly, lack of existing literature including use of cross-sectional research design around materialism also added to the limitations of this study. Limitations aside, the current study suggests that increasing materialism within Chinese organizations is likely to exert potentially significant adverse effects on employee engagement and, hence, the overall quality of work. Originality/value The current study has empirically discovered a possible relationship between materialism and employee engagement, which is rarely examined in previous studies. In addition, the study also proposes a psychological mechanism through which materialistic values can influence employee engagement. The findings are practically important to human resource management practices in China and theoretically important for the exploration of antecedents of employee engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物质主义对中国员工敬业度的负面影响
本研究的目的是探讨唯物主义对中国员工敬业度的影响。研究还考察了员工工作场所自主需求满意度的中介作用。设计/方法/方法数据收集自中国19个省市不同公司的217名员工。这些参与者完成了三个自我报告量表,包括物质价值观、员工敬业度和工作中的自主性需求满意度。采用Pearson相关分析、层次回归分析和结构方程模型对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,工作中的自主性需求满足完全介导了物质主义对员工敬业度的影响。研究的局限性/启示这项研究的局限性在于确定了在组织和国家层面上不健全的物质主义衡量标准。同样,缺乏现有文献,包括围绕唯物主义使用横断面研究设计,也增加了本研究的局限性。撇开局限性不谈,目前的研究表明,中国组织中日益增长的物质主义可能会对员工敬业度产生潜在的重大不利影响,从而影响整体工作质量。本研究通过实证发现了物质主义与员工敬业度之间可能存在的关系,这在以往的研究中很少得到检验。此外,本研究还提出了物质价值观影响员工敬业度的心理机制。研究结果对中国人力资源管理实践具有重要的现实意义,对探索员工敬业度的前因具有重要的理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Success Factors for Job Seekers among Chinese University Graduates Based on Social Career Cognitive Theory Global Research on Ethical Leadership: A Bibliometric Investigation and Knowledge Mapping How Transformational Leadership Affects Firm Innovation Performance - A Perspective Based on Environmental Dynamism and Business Model Innovation The Impact of Paternalistic Leadership Styles on Employee Engagement in the Pharmaceutical Distribution Industry: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital Research on Criminal Laws and the Regulations of Labor Conflicts in P.R. China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1