How do directors of public health perceive leadership?

M. J. McAreav, B. Alimo‐Metcalfe, J. Connelly
{"title":"How do directors of public health perceive leadership?","authors":"M. J. McAreav, B. Alimo‐Metcalfe, J. Connelly","doi":"10.1108/jmm.2001.15.6.446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how directors of public health (DsPH) perceive effective leadership. Kelly's repertory grid technique is used. A total of 13 out of a possible 14 DsPH in one NHS region of England were interviewed. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were carried out. The findings show that male DsPH (n = 8) rate their leadership ability more highly than do female DsPH (n = 5). Qualitative analysis produced a number of categories of constructs, some of which are perceived to be indicative of effective leadership, these being \"working for others\", \"personal attributes\", \"vision and innovation\" and \"courage and integrity\" Some categories appear to be applicable only to the UK (or to public health) and not to the existing dominant US models of leadership. In general, DsPH perceptions of effective leadership converge with current theories; most specifically the UK-based theories. This study therefore refutes any simple extrapolation of US theories of leadership to UK health organisations.","PeriodicalId":80033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of management in medicine","volume":"15 6 1","pages":"446-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jmm.2001.15.6.446","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of management in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmm.2001.15.6.446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This study examines how directors of public health (DsPH) perceive effective leadership. Kelly's repertory grid technique is used. A total of 13 out of a possible 14 DsPH in one NHS region of England were interviewed. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were carried out. The findings show that male DsPH (n = 8) rate their leadership ability more highly than do female DsPH (n = 5). Qualitative analysis produced a number of categories of constructs, some of which are perceived to be indicative of effective leadership, these being "working for others", "personal attributes", "vision and innovation" and "courage and integrity" Some categories appear to be applicable only to the UK (or to public health) and not to the existing dominant US models of leadership. In general, DsPH perceptions of effective leadership converge with current theories; most specifically the UK-based theories. This study therefore refutes any simple extrapolation of US theories of leadership to UK health organisations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共卫生主管如何看待领导力?
本研究探讨公共卫生(DsPH)主任如何看待有效的领导。凯利的剧目网格技术被使用。在英格兰的一个NHS地区,总共有13名可能的14名DsPH接受了采访。进行了定性和定量分析。研究结果显示,男性心理学博士(n = 8)比女性心理学博士(n = 5)对自己的领导能力评价更高。定性分析产生了许多类别的结构,其中一些被认为是有效领导的标志,这些是“为他人工作”、“个人属性”、“远见和创新”和“勇气和正直”。有些类别似乎只适用于英国(或公共卫生),而不适用于现有的美国主导的领导模式。总体而言,DsPH对有效领导的看法与当前理论趋同;尤其是以英国为基础的理论。因此,这项研究驳斥了任何将美国领导力理论简单外推到英国卫生组织的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality in health care Patient perceptions of service quality Multi‐professional Learning for Nurses: Breaking the Boundaries Cross-sector working: speech and language therapists in education. Managing performance and performance management: information strategy and service user involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1