{"title":"Pesticides and health: a review of evidence on health effects, valuation of risks, and benefit-cost analysis.","authors":"D. Tago, Henrik Andersson, Nicolas Treich","doi":"10.1108/S0731-219920140000024006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nThis study presents literature reviews for the period 2000-2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThis study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThis study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"24 1","pages":"203-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0731-219920140000024006","citationCount":"111","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health economics and health services research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-219920140000024006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111
Abstract
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH
This study presents literature reviews for the period 2000-2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures.
FINDINGS
This study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE
This study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.