Government and Intra-Party Opposition: Dissent within the Conservative Parliamentary Party in the 1930s

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Studies Pub Date : 1971-06-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1467-9248.1971.TB00668.X
J. Rasmussen
{"title":"Government and Intra-Party Opposition: Dissent within the Conservative Parliamentary Party in the 1930s","authors":"J. Rasmussen","doi":"10.1111/J.1467-9248.1971.TB00668.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DURING most of the last half century the Opposition political parties in Britain have managed to control a sizable share of the seats in the House of Commons. Some would argue that such a situation is essential if the accountability of the Government is to be maintained. The questions and dissents of a small Opposition can be brushed aside with relative ease as long as it continues to observe parliamentary niceties. While the size and the effectiveness of the Opposition by no mean correlate perfectly, the first clearly is likely to have a significant impact upon the second. During the decade of the 1930s, however, the Opposition in the Commons was numerically its weakest of any time in the last half century. Following the 1931 General Election the Opposition held only 10 per cent. of the seats in the House of Commons, exactly the situation which raised some cries of alarm about the health of democracy in West Germany in the late 1960s. Within a year the figure rose to 15 per cent. when the Liberals went into Opposition. The 1935 General Election improved matters further as Opposition groups expanded their share of seats to 30 per cent. Even that figure, however, is lower than the ones prevailing during any other decade in the last half century.2 During the 1930s, then, the Opposition in the Commons not only was at its lowest ebb numerically in recent years, but remained weak constantly for almost ten years. That this period was one of growing international crises which eventually culminated in world war adds to the significanceof Britain’s unusual domestic political situation then. With the effectiveness of the Opposition hampered by its weakness, there was both the opportunity and the necessity for dissidents among the Government’s supporters to call it to account. Were the Government to be challenged effectively to defend and justify its policies it would have to be from this quarter. This study focuses on Government and Opposition in a parliamentary system, but on a special type of Opposition. It examines opposition coming from the Government’s nominal supporters during a period in which the preponderance of Government strength in the parliament threatens to make the formal Opposition inconsequential. It seeks to discover the extent to which and the methods by which","PeriodicalId":51379,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"172 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"1971-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1467-9248.1971.TB00668.X","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9248.1971.TB00668.X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

DURING most of the last half century the Opposition political parties in Britain have managed to control a sizable share of the seats in the House of Commons. Some would argue that such a situation is essential if the accountability of the Government is to be maintained. The questions and dissents of a small Opposition can be brushed aside with relative ease as long as it continues to observe parliamentary niceties. While the size and the effectiveness of the Opposition by no mean correlate perfectly, the first clearly is likely to have a significant impact upon the second. During the decade of the 1930s, however, the Opposition in the Commons was numerically its weakest of any time in the last half century. Following the 1931 General Election the Opposition held only 10 per cent. of the seats in the House of Commons, exactly the situation which raised some cries of alarm about the health of democracy in West Germany in the late 1960s. Within a year the figure rose to 15 per cent. when the Liberals went into Opposition. The 1935 General Election improved matters further as Opposition groups expanded their share of seats to 30 per cent. Even that figure, however, is lower than the ones prevailing during any other decade in the last half century.2 During the 1930s, then, the Opposition in the Commons not only was at its lowest ebb numerically in recent years, but remained weak constantly for almost ten years. That this period was one of growing international crises which eventually culminated in world war adds to the significanceof Britain’s unusual domestic political situation then. With the effectiveness of the Opposition hampered by its weakness, there was both the opportunity and the necessity for dissidents among the Government’s supporters to call it to account. Were the Government to be challenged effectively to defend and justify its policies it would have to be from this quarter. This study focuses on Government and Opposition in a parliamentary system, but on a special type of Opposition. It examines opposition coming from the Government’s nominal supporters during a period in which the preponderance of Government strength in the parliament threatens to make the formal Opposition inconsequential. It seeks to discover the extent to which and the methods by which
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府与党内反对派:20世纪30年代保守党议会党内的不同意见
在过去半个世纪的大部分时间里,英国的反对党设法控制了下议院中相当大的份额。有些人会争辩说,如果要维持政府的问责制,这种情况是必不可少的。只要一个小反对派继续遵守议会的规矩,他们的质疑和异议就可以相对轻松地被置之不理。虽然反对党的规模和效力并非完全相关,但前者显然可能对后者产生重大影响。然而,在20世纪30年代的十年里,下议院的反对党在人数上是过去半个世纪以来最弱的。1931年大选后,反对党在下议院只占有10%的席位,正是这种情况在20世纪60年代末引起了一些人对西德民主健康状况的担忧。不到一年,当自由党成为反对党时,这一数字上升到15%。1935年的大选进一步改善了情况,反对党的席位份额扩大到30%。然而,即使是这个数字,也低于过去半个世纪中任何其他十年的普遍比例在20世纪30年代,下议院的反对党不仅在人数上处于近年来的最低点,而且在近十年的时间里一直处于弱势。这一时期是国际危机不断增长的时期之一,最终以世界大战告终,这增加了当时英国不同寻常的国内政治形势的重要性。由于反对派的效力因其软弱而受到阻碍,政府支持者中的持不同政见者有机会也有必要要求它承担责任。如果要对政府提出有效的挑战,要求其捍卫其政策并为其辩护,就必须从这个方面提出挑战。本研究的重点是议会制下的政府和反对派,但针对的是一种特殊类型的反对派。它审查了政府名义上的支持者在政府力量在议会中的优势有可能使正式反对派变得无关紧要的时期提出的反对意见。它试图发现在何种程度上和通过何种方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Studies
Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Political Studies is a leading international journal committed to the very highest standards of peer review that publishes academically rigorous and original work in all fields of politics and international relations. The editors encourage a pluralistic approach to political science and debate across the discipline. Political Studies aims to develop the most promising new work available and to facilitate professional communication in political science.
期刊最新文献
The Group Appeal Strategy: Beyond the Policy Perspective on Party Electoral Success Citizen-Led Democratic Change: How Australia’s Community Independents Movement Is Reshaping Representative Democracy The Voter Next Door: Stigma Effects on Advance Voting for Radical Right Parties Exploring the Causes of Technocratic Minister Appointments in Europe Keeping Up With the Joneses? Neighbourhood Effects on the Vote
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1