Water pollution control in democratic societies: a cross-national analysis of sources of public beliefs in Japan and in the United States.

N. Lovrich, J. Pierce, Taketsugu Tsurutani, Takematsu Abe
{"title":"Water pollution control in democratic societies: a cross-national analysis of sources of public beliefs in Japan and in the United States.","authors":"N. Lovrich, J. Pierce, Taketsugu Tsurutani, Takematsu Abe","doi":"10.1111/J.1541-1338.1985.TB00367.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postindustrial society seems to bring with it an inevitable heightening of official and public concern with environmental pollution. In light of this fact it becomes important to understand the dynamics by which public opinion is formulated in this area of public policy. What factors are associated with citizens placing concern for environmental pollution above other public policy concernsq What individual characteristics are associ- ated with the development of the view that government ought to take direct action to prevent or deal with environmental pollutionq Are such factors common to postindustrial democratic societies generallyq The study reported here identifies the similarities and differences in the patterns and correlates of pollution relevant beliefs and behavior in Japan (in the cities of Llishima, Fuji and Numazu in Shizuoka Prefecture] and the United States (Spokane City and County, Washington State). A comparative study of pollution policy can be especially instructive inasmuch as unique cultural, economic, historical and social patterns may generate distinctive citizen conceptions of desired policy outcomes and means to achieve them. Copyright 1985 by The Policy Studies Organization.","PeriodicalId":82332,"journal":{"name":"Policy studies review","volume":"5 2 1","pages":"431-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1541-1338.1985.TB00367.X","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy studies review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-1338.1985.TB00367.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Postindustrial society seems to bring with it an inevitable heightening of official and public concern with environmental pollution. In light of this fact it becomes important to understand the dynamics by which public opinion is formulated in this area of public policy. What factors are associated with citizens placing concern for environmental pollution above other public policy concernsq What individual characteristics are associ- ated with the development of the view that government ought to take direct action to prevent or deal with environmental pollutionq Are such factors common to postindustrial democratic societies generallyq The study reported here identifies the similarities and differences in the patterns and correlates of pollution relevant beliefs and behavior in Japan (in the cities of Llishima, Fuji and Numazu in Shizuoka Prefecture] and the United States (Spokane City and County, Washington State). A comparative study of pollution policy can be especially instructive inasmuch as unique cultural, economic, historical and social patterns may generate distinctive citizen conceptions of desired policy outcomes and means to achieve them. Copyright 1985 by The Policy Studies Organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主社会的水污染控制:日本和美国公众信念来源的跨国分析。
后工业社会似乎不可避免地加剧了官方和公众对环境污染的关注。鉴于这一事实,了解公共政策这一领域中公众舆论形成的动力就变得很重要。什么因素与公民将对环境污染的关注置于其他公共政策关注之上有关?什么个人特征与政府应该采取直接行动防止或处理环境污染的观点的发展有关?这些因素在后工业民主社会中普遍存在吗以及日本(静冈县的利岛市、富士市和沼津市)和美国(华盛顿州的斯波坎市和县)的行为。对污染政策进行比较研究可能特别具有指导意义,因为独特的文化、经济、历史和社会模式可能产生公民对所期望的政策结果和实现这些结果的手段的独特概念。政策研究组织1985年版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Separating analysis from politics: acid rain in Europe. Scientific-bureaucratic medicine and U.K. health policy. Scientific-bureaucratic medicine and U.K. health policy. The worst of both worlds: nursing home regulation in the United States. Managed competition in Florida health care: its strengths and weaknesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1