Estimating Discretization Error with Preset Orders of Accuracy and Fractional Refinement Ratios

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4056491
S. C. Y. Lo
{"title":"Estimating Discretization Error with Preset Orders of Accuracy and Fractional Refinement Ratios","authors":"S. C. Y. Lo","doi":"10.1115/1.4056491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Solution verification is crucial for establishing the reliability of simulations. A central challenge is to estimate the discretization error accurately and reliably. Many approaches to this estimation are based on the observed order of accuracy; however, it may fail when the numerical solutions lie outside the asymptotic range. Here we propose a grid refinement method which adopts constant orders given by the user, called the Prescribed Orders Expansion Method (POEM). Through an iterative procedure, the user is guaranteed to obtain the dominant orders of the discretization error. The user can also compare the corresponding terms to quantify the degree of asymptotic convergence of the numerical solutions. These features ensure that the estimation of the discretization error is accurate and reliable. Moreover, the implementation of POEM is the same for any dimensions and refinement paths. We demonstrate these capabilities using some advection and diffusion problems and standard refinement paths. The computational cost of using POEM is lower if the refinement ratio is larger; however, the number of shared grid points where POEM applies also decreases, causing greater uncertainty in the global estimates of the discretization error. We find that the proportion of shared grid points is maximized when the refinement ratios are in a certain form of fractions. Furthermore, we develop the Method of Interpolating Differences between Approximate Solutions (MIDAS) for creating shared grid points in the domain. These approaches allow users of POEM to obtain a global estimate of the discretization error of lower uncertainty at a reduced computational cost.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":"abs/2201.00264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solution verification is crucial for establishing the reliability of simulations. A central challenge is to estimate the discretization error accurately and reliably. Many approaches to this estimation are based on the observed order of accuracy; however, it may fail when the numerical solutions lie outside the asymptotic range. Here we propose a grid refinement method which adopts constant orders given by the user, called the Prescribed Orders Expansion Method (POEM). Through an iterative procedure, the user is guaranteed to obtain the dominant orders of the discretization error. The user can also compare the corresponding terms to quantify the degree of asymptotic convergence of the numerical solutions. These features ensure that the estimation of the discretization error is accurate and reliable. Moreover, the implementation of POEM is the same for any dimensions and refinement paths. We demonstrate these capabilities using some advection and diffusion problems and standard refinement paths. The computational cost of using POEM is lower if the refinement ratio is larger; however, the number of shared grid points where POEM applies also decreases, causing greater uncertainty in the global estimates of the discretization error. We find that the proportion of shared grid points is maximized when the refinement ratios are in a certain form of fractions. Furthermore, we develop the Method of Interpolating Differences between Approximate Solutions (MIDAS) for creating shared grid points in the domain. These approaches allow users of POEM to obtain a global estimate of the discretization error of lower uncertainty at a reduced computational cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预估离散化误差的精度和分数精化比
解的验证是建立仿真可靠性的关键。一个核心的挑战是准确可靠地估计离散误差。这种估计的许多方法都是基于观察到的精度顺序;然而,当数值解超出渐近范围时,它可能失效。本文提出了一种采用用户给出的常数阶数的网格细化方法,称为规定阶数展开法(POEM)。通过迭代过程,保证用户得到离散误差的主导阶。用户还可以比较相应的项来量化数值解的渐近收敛程度。这些特点保证了离散化误差估计的准确性和可靠性。此外,对于任何维度和细化路径,POEM的实现都是相同的。我们使用一些平流和扩散问题以及标准细化路径来演示这些功能。细化比越大,使用POEM的计算成本越低;然而,应用POEM的共享网格点的数量也会减少,这在离散化误差的全局估计中造成了更大的不确定性。我们发现,当细化比例为一定的分数形式时,共享网格点的比例最大。此外,我们开发了近似解之间的插值差异方法(MIDAS),用于在域中创建共享网格点。这些方法使POEM的用户能够以较少的计算成本获得较低不确定性的离散化误差的全局估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Automatic Ground-Truth Image Labeling for Deep Neural Network Training and Evaluation Using Industrial Robotics and Motion Capture Using Responsive Feedback in Scaling a Gender Norms-Shifting Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo. A Solution Verification Study For Urans Simulations of Flow Over a 5:1 Rectangular Cylinder Using Grid Convergence Index And Least Squares Procedures Strategies for Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation Experiments On the Verification of Finite Element Determinations of Stress Concentration Factors for Handbooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1