Policing and Race: Disparate Treatment, Perceptions, and Policy Responses

IF 7.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Issues and Policy Review Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1111/SIPR.12019
K. Kahn, Karin D. Martin
{"title":"Policing and Race: Disparate Treatment, Perceptions, and Policy Responses","authors":"K. Kahn, Karin D. Martin","doi":"10.1111/SIPR.12019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Police shootings of unarmed African Americans, including Michael Brown, Sean Bell, and Oscar Grant, sparked nationwide protests, debate, and consciousness-raising about race in policing. These high-profile shootings provide pressing reason for an in-depth analysis of race, policing, and policy. This article details the deleterious consequences that racial disparities in policing have on the lives of racial minorities. In trying to understand the source of this disparate treatment, it highlights what empirical social science knows about racial bias in policing, emphasizing how contemporary forms of racial bias can contribute to racially disparate outcomes. The article makes a distinction between what research reveals about the existence of racial bias in policing and perceptions of racially biased policing. Existing racial bias is not always accurately identified nor perceived, which makes it harder to enact change. Examining how to counteract its potential influence, it reviews empirically based interventions to address both police behavior and community perceptions regarding race in policing. From a policy perspective, the article considers the use of police body-worn cameras as a means to promote equitable policing. It concludes with recommendations based on scientific literature, arguing that effective policies must address both the perception of and actual biased policing.","PeriodicalId":47129,"journal":{"name":"Social Issues and Policy Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"82-121"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/SIPR.12019","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Issues and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/SIPR.12019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Police shootings of unarmed African Americans, including Michael Brown, Sean Bell, and Oscar Grant, sparked nationwide protests, debate, and consciousness-raising about race in policing. These high-profile shootings provide pressing reason for an in-depth analysis of race, policing, and policy. This article details the deleterious consequences that racial disparities in policing have on the lives of racial minorities. In trying to understand the source of this disparate treatment, it highlights what empirical social science knows about racial bias in policing, emphasizing how contemporary forms of racial bias can contribute to racially disparate outcomes. The article makes a distinction between what research reveals about the existence of racial bias in policing and perceptions of racially biased policing. Existing racial bias is not always accurately identified nor perceived, which makes it harder to enact change. Examining how to counteract its potential influence, it reviews empirically based interventions to address both police behavior and community perceptions regarding race in policing. From a policy perspective, the article considers the use of police body-worn cameras as a means to promote equitable policing. It concludes with recommendations based on scientific literature, arguing that effective policies must address both the perception of and actual biased policing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察与种族:不同的待遇、观念和政策回应
警察枪杀手无寸铁的非裔美国人,包括迈克尔·布朗、肖恩·贝尔和奥斯卡·格兰特,引发了全国性的抗议、辩论,并提高了人们对警察种族问题的认识。这些引人注目的枪击事件为深入分析种族、治安和政策提供了迫切的理由。这篇文章详细描述了警务中的种族差异对少数族裔生活造成的有害后果。在试图理解这种差别待遇的来源时,它强调了经验社会科学对警务中的种族偏见的了解,强调了当代形式的种族偏见如何导致种族差异的结果。这篇文章区分了研究揭示的警察中存在种族偏见和对种族偏见警察的看法。现有的种族偏见并不总是被准确地识别或感知,这使得实施变革变得更加困难。研究如何抵消其潜在影响,它回顾了基于经验的干预措施,以解决警察行为和社区对警务中种族的看法。从政策的角度来看,本文认为使用警察随身摄像机是促进公平警务的一种手段。报告最后提出了基于科学文献的建议,认为有效的政策必须同时解决人们对有偏见的警务的看法和实际存在的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The mission of Social Issues and Policy Review (SIPR) is to provide state of the art and timely theoretical and empirical reviews of topics and programs of research that are directly relevant to understanding and addressing social issues and public policy.Papers will be accessible and relevant to a broad audience and will normally be based on a program of research. Works in SIPR will represent perspectives directly relevant to the psychological study of social issues and public policy. Contributions are expected to be review papers that present a strong scholarly foundation and consider how research and theory can inform social issues and policy or articulate the implication of social issues and public policy for theory and research.
期刊最新文献
A human rights‐based approach to climates injustices at the local, national, and international levels: Program and policy recommendations The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective Omission as a modern form of bias against Native Peoples: Implications for policies and practices Psychological science and its societal mission during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: The Motivation Barometer as an evidence‐informed policy instrument in Belgium The role of suspect development practices in eyewitness identification accuracy and racial disparities in wrongful conviction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1