CPEC in Pakistan’s Quest for Energy Security: Clarifying Some Misperceptions

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-19 DOI:10.1142/s237774002150007x
Murad Ali
{"title":"CPEC in Pakistan’s Quest for Energy Security: Clarifying Some Misperceptions","authors":"Murad Ali","doi":"10.1142/s237774002150007x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the inception of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), one of the six corridors envisaged under President Xi’s signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Pakistan, there has been criticism in academic circles as well as media about sustainability issues. In an article published in Strategic Analysis in 2017 entitled “CPEC in Pakistan’s Quest for Energy Security,” the authors raised some questions related to Chinese-funded projects. Based on the overall analysis of various CPEC projects, the paper had reached several conclusions. First, it stated that “the prospects of Pakistan being energy sufficient seem bleak for several reasons” related to the lack of proper implementation mechanisms. Second, it argued that there are discrepancies concerning financing of CPEC energy projects as it was not clear whether it was loan or foreign direct investment (FDI). In the same vein, the authors asserted that “most of the projects would be financed by Pakistan, not by China or other foreign investors.” Third, the paper emphasized that there are concerns that Chinese companies would bring their own labor. The authors also highlighted the issue of tied aid or loans as most of the procurement involved Chinese products and services. And finally, the paper discussed the issue of special incentives given to Chinese companies as they are exempted from various taxes. Based on primary data obtained in Pakistan and complemented by secondary data available in the form of government documents and policy reports of national and international organizations, this paper challenges the major assumptions presented in the previous work on this subject. The study concludes that although there are issues in smooth implementation of projects, the CPEC has the potential to make Pakistan energy sufficient and usher in a new era of development.","PeriodicalId":42595,"journal":{"name":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s237774002150007x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the inception of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), one of the six corridors envisaged under President Xi’s signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Pakistan, there has been criticism in academic circles as well as media about sustainability issues. In an article published in Strategic Analysis in 2017 entitled “CPEC in Pakistan’s Quest for Energy Security,” the authors raised some questions related to Chinese-funded projects. Based on the overall analysis of various CPEC projects, the paper had reached several conclusions. First, it stated that “the prospects of Pakistan being energy sufficient seem bleak for several reasons” related to the lack of proper implementation mechanisms. Second, it argued that there are discrepancies concerning financing of CPEC energy projects as it was not clear whether it was loan or foreign direct investment (FDI). In the same vein, the authors asserted that “most of the projects would be financed by Pakistan, not by China or other foreign investors.” Third, the paper emphasized that there are concerns that Chinese companies would bring their own labor. The authors also highlighted the issue of tied aid or loans as most of the procurement involved Chinese products and services. And finally, the paper discussed the issue of special incentives given to Chinese companies as they are exempted from various taxes. Based on primary data obtained in Pakistan and complemented by secondary data available in the form of government documents and policy reports of national and international organizations, this paper challenges the major assumptions presented in the previous work on this subject. The study concludes that although there are issues in smooth implementation of projects, the CPEC has the potential to make Pakistan energy sufficient and usher in a new era of development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中巴经济走廊在巴基斯坦寻求能源安全:澄清一些误解
2017年,作者在《战略分析》上发表了一篇题为《中巴经济走廊在巴基斯坦寻求能源安全》的文章,提出了一些与中国资助项目有关的问题。在对中巴经济走廊各项目进行综合分析的基础上,本文得出了几点结论。首先,报告指出,由于缺乏适当的执行机制,“巴基斯坦能源充足的前景似乎很黯淡”。其次,它认为中巴经济走廊能源项目的融资存在差异,因为不清楚它是贷款还是外国直接投资(FDI)。同样,作者断言“大多数项目将由巴基斯坦提供资金,而不是中国或其他外国投资者。”第三,白皮书强调,有人担心中国企业会带来自己的劳动力。报告作者还强调了附带援助或贷款的问题,因为大多数采购涉及中国的产品和服务。最后,本文讨论了中国企业在免征各种税种时所受到的特殊激励问题。基于在巴基斯坦获得的主要数据,并辅以以政府文件和国家和国际组织政策报告形式提供的次要数据,本文挑战了之前关于这一主题的工作中提出的主要假设。报告认为,中巴经济走廊虽然在项目顺利实施方面存在问题,但有潜力使巴基斯坦能源充足,开启发展新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
China's Policy toward Afghanistan and Its Impact on India Exporting the American Dream? Ideology and US China Policy Since 9/11 From Communist Allies to Pragmatics Partners: A Historical View of Albanian–Chinese Relations China–EU Climate Complex Interdependence Amid Covid-19 and Geopolitical Tensions: Prospects for Future The Chinese and American Military Installations in Djibouti: National and Regional Security Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1