Timothy Jones, Justine B. Allen, Stephen Macdonald
{"title":"The “Face” of Coach Development: A Systematic Review of the Role of the Coach Developer","authors":"Timothy Jones, Justine B. Allen, Stephen Macdonald","doi":"10.1123/iscj.2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper was to systematically review the peer-reviewed literature on the role of the coach developer (CD). Three questions guided this review: (a) who is the CD, (b) what do they do, and (c) how do they do it? Using five electronic databases—SPORTDiscus, ERIC, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Scopus—a total of 595 articles were initially found with 42 identified as appropriate for inclusion following PRISMA guidelines. A further 11 were added, via the screening of reference lists and during the process of writing, to total 53 articles. Data analysis comprised of content analysis to describe and identify gaps in the research, and reflexive thematic analysis to facilitate the analysis of the findings from the included studies. Content analysis findings show an increase in researching this role and a breadth of methodology and theoretical frameworks being employed. Utilising reflexive thematic analysis, seven themes were generated to understand the who, what, and how of the CD. Findings suggest a diverse and contextualised appreciation of the various roles the CD undertakes as encompassed by the International Council for Coaching Excellence (ICCE) umbrella term definition. The discussion reveals the complexity of the role as CDs navigate who they are, what they do, and how they do it. Recommendations are made for future research to mediate knowledge gaps and move towards alignment and understanding of this key figure.","PeriodicalId":45934,"journal":{"name":"International Sport Coaching Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sport Coaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to systematically review the peer-reviewed literature on the role of the coach developer (CD). Three questions guided this review: (a) who is the CD, (b) what do they do, and (c) how do they do it? Using five electronic databases—SPORTDiscus, ERIC, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Scopus—a total of 595 articles were initially found with 42 identified as appropriate for inclusion following PRISMA guidelines. A further 11 were added, via the screening of reference lists and during the process of writing, to total 53 articles. Data analysis comprised of content analysis to describe and identify gaps in the research, and reflexive thematic analysis to facilitate the analysis of the findings from the included studies. Content analysis findings show an increase in researching this role and a breadth of methodology and theoretical frameworks being employed. Utilising reflexive thematic analysis, seven themes were generated to understand the who, what, and how of the CD. Findings suggest a diverse and contextualised appreciation of the various roles the CD undertakes as encompassed by the International Council for Coaching Excellence (ICCE) umbrella term definition. The discussion reveals the complexity of the role as CDs navigate who they are, what they do, and how they do it. Recommendations are made for future research to mediate knowledge gaps and move towards alignment and understanding of this key figure.
本文的目的是系统地回顾同行评议的关于教练开发人员(CD)角色的文献。三个问题指导了这次审查:(a)谁是裁谈会,(b)他们做什么,(c)他们如何做?通过使用五个电子数据库——sportdiscus、ERIC、PsycInfo、Web of Science和scopus——最初共发现了595篇文章,其中42篇被确定为符合PRISMA指南的合适文章。通过对参考文献清单的筛选和在编写过程中又增加了11篇,使文章总数达到53篇。数据分析由内容分析和反思性专题分析组成,内容分析用于描述和识别研究中的差距,反思性专题分析用于促进对纳入研究结果的分析。内容分析结果表明,对这一角色的研究有所增加,并且采用了广泛的方法和理论框架。利用反身性主题分析,产生了七个主题,以理解谁、做什么和如何做培训。研究结果表明,在国际卓越教练理事会(ICCE)总括术语定义的范围内,对培训承担的各种角色有不同的、情境化的认识。讨论揭示了角色的复杂性,因为cd在导航他们是谁、他们做什么以及他们如何做。为未来的研究提出建议,以调解知识差距,并朝着对齐和理解这一关键数字的方向发展。