{"title":"PSYCHOSES","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/jnnp.s1-15.59.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE various intelligence tests in the main are closely similar and the varied personality tests on the whole tally although there are certain discrepancies. In some respects in the personality tests the twins differ distinctly, particularly when the quality of their reactions is taken into consideration. One appeared to be more extraverted and sociable, somewhat better adjusted, somewhat self-assertive and rather independent. The other was decidedly less extraverted, and according to two tests even somewhat introverted and less well adjusted. The differences of the personalities appeared to be differences of degree rather than of kind. Graphology does not claim that it can improve upon the diagnosis of intelligence based on the standardized tests; but it is felt that the analysis of the handwriting has supplemented the findings of the emotional tests. A younger brother seems less similar to either twin than the twins to each other; but as he grows older he may become more similar to his twin brothers than his tests at the age of 16 and his writing at the age of 15 would indicate. On the whole the case suggests-as in fact did the majority of other cases of identical twins reared apart-that there is a greater similarity in intelligence than in emotional reactions. C. S. R.","PeriodicalId":50117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Psychopathology","volume":"11 1","pages":"259 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1935-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jnnp.s1-15.59.259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.s1-15.59.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

THE various intelligence tests in the main are closely similar and the varied personality tests on the whole tally although there are certain discrepancies. In some respects in the personality tests the twins differ distinctly, particularly when the quality of their reactions is taken into consideration. One appeared to be more extraverted and sociable, somewhat better adjusted, somewhat self-assertive and rather independent. The other was decidedly less extraverted, and according to two tests even somewhat introverted and less well adjusted. The differences of the personalities appeared to be differences of degree rather than of kind. Graphology does not claim that it can improve upon the diagnosis of intelligence based on the standardized tests; but it is felt that the analysis of the handwriting has supplemented the findings of the emotional tests. A younger brother seems less similar to either twin than the twins to each other; but as he grows older he may become more similar to his twin brothers than his tests at the age of 16 and his writing at the age of 15 would indicate. On the whole the case suggests-as in fact did the majority of other cases of identical twins reared apart-that there is a greater similarity in intelligence than in emotional reactions. C. S. R.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病
各种各样的智力测试大体上是相似的,各种各样的性格测试总体上是一致的,尽管有一定的差异。在性格测试的某些方面,双胞胎有明显的不同,特别是当他们的反应质量被考虑在内时。其中一组似乎更外向、更善于交际,在某种程度上更能适应环境,在某种程度上更自信、更独立。另一个人显然不那么外向,根据两项测试,他甚至有些内向,适应能力也较差。性格的差异似乎是程度上的差异,而不是种类上的差异。笔迹学并没有声称它可以改进基于标准化测试的智力诊断;但人们认为,对笔迹的分析补充了情感测试的结果。一个弟弟和双胞胎中的任何一个似乎都不像双胞胎彼此相似;但随着年龄的增长,他可能会比16岁时的测试和15岁时的写作所显示的更像他的双胞胎兄弟。总的来说,这个案例表明——事实上大多数其他同卵双胞胎分开抚养的案例也是如此——智力上的相似性大于情感反应上的相似性。c.s.r。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VEGETATIVE NEUROLOGY. PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Amaurotic Idiocy and the Lipoidoses NEUROPATHOLOGY SENSORIMOTOR NEUROLOGY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1