A. Aysenne, K. Albright, Tiffany L Mathias, Tiffany Chang, A. Boehme, T. Beasley, S. Martin-Schild
{"title":"24-Hour ICH Score Is a Better Predictor of Outcome than Admission ICH Score","authors":"A. Aysenne, K. Albright, Tiffany L Mathias, Tiffany Chang, A. Boehme, T. Beasley, S. Martin-Schild","doi":"10.1155/2013/605286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The ICH score is a validated tool for predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Aims and/or Hypothesis The aim of this study is to determine if the ICH score calculated 24 hours after admission is a better predictor of mortality than the ICH score calculated on admission. Methods Patients presenting to our center with ICH from 7/08-12/10 were retrospectively identified from our prospective stroke registry. ICH scores were calculated based on initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and emergent head computed tomography (CT) on initial presentation and were recalculated after 24 hours. Results A total of 91 patients out of 121 had complete data for admission and 24-hour ICH score. The ICH score changed in 38% from baseline to 24 hours. After adjusting for age, NIHSS on admission, and glucose, ICH score at 24 hours was a significant, independent predictor of mortality (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1–19–6.20, and P = 0.018), but ICH score on admission was not (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 0.88-5.24, and P = 0.095). Conclusion Early determination of the ICH score may incorrectly estimate the severity and expected outcome after ICH. Calculations of the ICH score 24 hours after admission will better predict early outcomes.","PeriodicalId":89959,"journal":{"name":"ISRN stroke","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/605286","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/605286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Background The ICH score is a validated tool for predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Aims and/or Hypothesis The aim of this study is to determine if the ICH score calculated 24 hours after admission is a better predictor of mortality than the ICH score calculated on admission. Methods Patients presenting to our center with ICH from 7/08-12/10 were retrospectively identified from our prospective stroke registry. ICH scores were calculated based on initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and emergent head computed tomography (CT) on initial presentation and were recalculated after 24 hours. Results A total of 91 patients out of 121 had complete data for admission and 24-hour ICH score. The ICH score changed in 38% from baseline to 24 hours. After adjusting for age, NIHSS on admission, and glucose, ICH score at 24 hours was a significant, independent predictor of mortality (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1–19–6.20, and P = 0.018), but ICH score on admission was not (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 0.88-5.24, and P = 0.095). Conclusion Early determination of the ICH score may incorrectly estimate the severity and expected outcome after ICH. Calculations of the ICH score 24 hours after admission will better predict early outcomes.
脑出血评分是预测脑出血患者30天发病率和死亡率的有效工具。目的和/或假设本研究的目的是确定入院后24小时计算的脑出血评分是否比入院时计算的脑出血评分更能预测死亡率。方法从前瞻性卒中登记资料中回顾性筛选7/08-12/10到我们中心就诊的脑出血患者。ICH评分根据初始格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)和初次出现时的急诊头部计算机断层扫描(CT)计算,并在24小时后重新计算。结果121例患者中91例有完整的入院资料和24小时ICH评分。从基线到24小时,ICH评分变化了38%。在调整年龄、入院时NIHSS和血糖后,24小时ICH评分是死亡率的显著独立预测因子(OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1-19-6.20, P = 0.018),但入院时ICH评分不是(OR = 2.14, 95% CI 0.88-5.24, P = 0.095)。结论早期判定脑出血评分可能对脑出血的严重程度和预期预后有不正确的估计。入院后24小时计算ICH评分可以更好地预测早期预后。