Free Light Chains and Intrathecal B Cells Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-12-28 DOI:10.1155/2016/2303857
Gabriella Passerini, Gloria Dalla Costa, Francesca Sangalli, Lucia Moiola, Bruno Colombo, Massimo Locatelli, Giancarlo Comi, Roberto Furlan, Vittorio Martinelli
{"title":"Free Light Chains and Intrathecal B Cells Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gabriella Passerini, Gloria Dalla Costa, Francesca Sangalli, Lucia Moiola, Bruno Colombo, Massimo Locatelli, Giancarlo Comi, Roberto Furlan, Vittorio Martinelli","doi":"10.1155/2016/2303857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. The presence of CSF oligoclonal bands (OBs) is an independent prognostic factor for multiple sclerosis (MS), but the difficulties in the standardization of the test and the interlaboratory variation in reporting have contributed to its limited use in the diagnosis of the disease. Standard nephelometric assays to measure free light chains (FLC) levels have been recently developed and the test may improve the detection of intrathecal B cells activity. <i>Methods</i>. The presence of OBs, kappa and lambda FLC levels, and standard indices of intrathecal inflammation were assessed in 100 consecutive patients, including patients with MS, clinically isolated syndromes (CIS), other inflammatory diseases of the CNS, and other noninflammatory diseases. <i>Results</i>. Both KFLC and LFLC correlated strongly with the presence of OCBs and with all common tests for intrathecal inflammation (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for all comparisons). KFLC and LFLC were significantly different in patients with MS and CIS compared to the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> < 0.001, resp.) and had a better diagnostic accuracy than all the other tests (area under the curve 82.3 % for KFLC index and 79.3 % for LFLC index). <i>Conclusion</i>. Nephelometric assays for KFLC in CSF reliably detect intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis and discriminate MS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":"2016 1","pages":"2303857"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5225376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2303857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The presence of CSF oligoclonal bands (OBs) is an independent prognostic factor for multiple sclerosis (MS), but the difficulties in the standardization of the test and the interlaboratory variation in reporting have contributed to its limited use in the diagnosis of the disease. Standard nephelometric assays to measure free light chains (FLC) levels have been recently developed and the test may improve the detection of intrathecal B cells activity. Methods. The presence of OBs, kappa and lambda FLC levels, and standard indices of intrathecal inflammation were assessed in 100 consecutive patients, including patients with MS, clinically isolated syndromes (CIS), other inflammatory diseases of the CNS, and other noninflammatory diseases. Results. Both KFLC and LFLC correlated strongly with the presence of OCBs and with all common tests for intrathecal inflammation (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). KFLC and LFLC were significantly different in patients with MS and CIS compared to the other groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, resp.) and had a better diagnostic accuracy than all the other tests (area under the curve 82.3 % for KFLC index and 79.3 % for LFLC index). Conclusion. Nephelometric assays for KFLC in CSF reliably detect intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis and discriminate MS patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症中的游离光链和鞘内 B 细胞活性:前瞻性研究与 Meta 分析。
背景。脑脊液寡克隆带(OBs)的存在是多发性硬化症(MS)的一个独立预后因素,但由于检测标准化困难以及实验室间报告的差异,导致其在疾病诊断中的应用有限。最近开发出了测量游离轻链(FLC)水平的标准肾图测定法,该方法可改善鞘内 B 细胞活性的检测。检测方法对连续 100 例患者(包括多发性硬化症、临床孤立综合征 (CIS)、中枢神经系统其他炎症性疾病和其他非炎症性疾病患者)进行了评估,以确定是否存在 OB、kappa 和 lambda FLC 水平以及鞘内炎症的标准指数。结果显示KFLC和LFLC均与OCB的存在以及所有常见的鞘内炎症测试密切相关(所有比较的P < 0.001)。与其他组别相比,KFLC 和 LFLC 在多发性硬化症和 CIS 患者中存在显著差异(分别为 p < 0.001 和 p < 0.001),其诊断准确性优于所有其他检测方法(KFLC 指数的曲线下面积为 82.3%,LFLC 指数的曲线下面积为 79.3%)。结论脑脊液中KFLC的内皮测定法能可靠地检测鞘内免疫球蛋白的合成并鉴别多发性硬化症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
White Matter Lesion Volumes on 3-T MRI in People With MS Who Had Followed a Diet and Lifestyle Program for More Than 10 Years. Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Contributors of Backward Walking in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Physical Therapy for Walking Difficulties in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1