As contribuições de Davidovich e Bahiana ao debate das escalas geográficas no Brasil

Matheus Da Silveira Grandi
{"title":"As contribuições de Davidovich e Bahiana ao debate das escalas geográficas no Brasil","authors":"Matheus Da Silveira Grandi","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2014.84532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theoretical debate about the geographical scales had increased during the last two decades, especially in the Anglophone context but without great interest of the Brazilian geography. This article seeks to reread two Brazilian publications of the 70’s and 80’s that develops some points about this subject, although they are frequently forgotten by the national literature. Some recent reflections made in the Anglo-Saxon context will be used as a contrast. The scalar perspective over the history of geographical thought, the emphasis in the coexistence of different scales in each parcel of the reality, and the perspective of the geographical scales as outcomes of spatial processes are some of the original contributions of these two. Finally, I want to reinforce the importance of a renew and an update of the discussion concerning the geographical scales in Brazil, once that this scales are constitutive elements of the thoughts and of the actions, making them important and efficient instruments of power.","PeriodicalId":30759,"journal":{"name":"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo","volume":"18 1","pages":"253-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOUSP Espaco e Tempo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2014.84532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The theoretical debate about the geographical scales had increased during the last two decades, especially in the Anglophone context but without great interest of the Brazilian geography. This article seeks to reread two Brazilian publications of the 70’s and 80’s that develops some points about this subject, although they are frequently forgotten by the national literature. Some recent reflections made in the Anglo-Saxon context will be used as a contrast. The scalar perspective over the history of geographical thought, the emphasis in the coexistence of different scales in each parcel of the reality, and the perspective of the geographical scales as outcomes of spatial processes are some of the original contributions of these two. Finally, I want to reinforce the importance of a renew and an update of the discussion concerning the geographical scales in Brazil, once that this scales are constitutive elements of the thoughts and of the actions, making them important and efficient instruments of power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Davidovich和Bahiana对巴西地理尺度辩论的贡献
在过去的二十年里,关于地理尺度的理论争论有所增加,特别是在英语国家的背景下,但对巴西地理学却没有很大的兴趣。这篇文章试图重读70年代和80年代的两份巴西出版物,其中发展了一些关于这个主题的观点,尽管它们经常被国家文献所遗忘。最近在盎格鲁-撒克逊背景下的一些反思将被用作对比。在地理思想史上的标量视角,强调不同尺度在每一块现实中共存,以及将地理尺度作为空间过程的结果的视角是这两者的一些原始贡献。最后,我要强调更新和更新关于巴西地理范围的讨论的重要性,一旦这种范围成为思想和行动的构成要素,使它们成为重要和有效的权力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Natureza e Arte na discussão da Paisagem Geográfica A necessidade da geografia eleitoral: as possibilidades do campo APP em topos de morro em dois maciços cristalinos de Florianópolis/SC: aplicação para diferentes modelados de relevo e segundo critérios de delimitação do Antigo e do Novo Código Florestal O papel da geografia na valorização da ciência Antropoceno e História: orbis hypothesis na construção de uma História Ambiental latinoamericana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1