{"title":"Questioning the Patient, Questioning Hippocrates: Rufus of Ephesus and the Pursuit of Knowledge.","authors":"M. Letts","doi":"10.1163/9789004305564_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rufus of Ephesus' short treatise, Quaestiones Medicinales, the only ancient medical work that takes as its topic the dialogue between doctor and patient, has usually been seen as a procedural practical handbook serving an essentially operational purpose. In this paper I argue that the treatise, with its insistent message that doctors cannot properly understand and treat illnesses unless they supplement their own knowledge by questioning patients, and its remarkable appreciation of the singularity of each patient's experience, shows itself to be no mere handbook but a work addressing the place of questioning in the clinical encounter. I illustrate some of the differences between Rufus' conceptualisation of the relevance and use of questioning and that which can be seen in the theoretical and descriptive writings of Galen and in the Hippocratic corpus, and show how apparent resonances with some of the preoccupations of modern Western healthcare can be used judiciously to elucidate the significance of those differences.","PeriodicalId":82835,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ancient medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":"81-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ancient medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004305564_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Rufus of Ephesus' short treatise, Quaestiones Medicinales, the only ancient medical work that takes as its topic the dialogue between doctor and patient, has usually been seen as a procedural practical handbook serving an essentially operational purpose. In this paper I argue that the treatise, with its insistent message that doctors cannot properly understand and treat illnesses unless they supplement their own knowledge by questioning patients, and its remarkable appreciation of the singularity of each patient's experience, shows itself to be no mere handbook but a work addressing the place of questioning in the clinical encounter. I illustrate some of the differences between Rufus' conceptualisation of the relevance and use of questioning and that which can be seen in the theoretical and descriptive writings of Galen and in the Hippocratic corpus, and show how apparent resonances with some of the preoccupations of modern Western healthcare can be used judiciously to elucidate the significance of those differences.
以弗所的鲁弗斯(Rufus of Ephesus)的短篇论文《医学问题》(Quaestiones Medicinales)是唯一一部以医患对话为主题的古代医学著作,通常被视为一本程序性的实用手册,服务于基本的操作目的。在这篇论文中,我认为,这本专著坚持认为,医生不能正确地理解和治疗疾病,除非他们通过询问病人来补充自己的知识,以及它对每个病人的独特经历的非凡欣赏,表明它不仅仅是一本手册,而是一本解决临床遇到问题的著作。我举例说明了鲁弗斯对问题的相关性和使用的概念化与盖伦的理论和描述性著作以及希波克拉底语料库中可以看到的一些差异,并展示了与现代西方医疗保健的一些关注的明显共鸣如何被明智地用来阐明这些差异的重要性。