Advancing Donald Schön's Reflective Practitioner: Where to Next?

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN ISSUES Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1162/desi_a_00722
Linus Tan;Anita Kocsis;Jane Burry
{"title":"Advancing Donald Schön's Reflective Practitioner: Where to Next?","authors":"Linus Tan;Anita Kocsis;Jane Burry","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1983, Donald Schön published his seminal work, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. The book emerged during the peak of the Design Methods movement, when works like L. Bruce Archer's Systematic Method for Designers and Herbert A. Simon's The Sciences of the Artificial argued for recognizing design processes as scientific inquiries. Coincidentally, Schön posited an alternative view to rationalizing design processes, called professional artistry, which is implicit professional knowledge. Using protocol studies in various disciplines, he demonstrated that professionals reflect-in-action while working and, as a result, learn and produce knowledge through doing (knowing-in-action). Since the 1980s, design theorists, researchers, and professionals have used Schön's work enthusiastically to articulate that designers learn more about their design process and design project as they design. Forty years after publication, The Reflective Practitioner continues to serve many design researchers as a foundation of learning from the experience of their design processes. However, this theory has limitations that must be recognized and addressed to stay relevant today. The Reflective Practitioner was written for individuals, whereas nowadays, designers often work in teams. The next step is to consider how individual reflections are shared and learned with other designers so that the team benefits from its collective reflective practices.","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"39 3","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10301939/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 1983, Donald Schön published his seminal work, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. The book emerged during the peak of the Design Methods movement, when works like L. Bruce Archer's Systematic Method for Designers and Herbert A. Simon's The Sciences of the Artificial argued for recognizing design processes as scientific inquiries. Coincidentally, Schön posited an alternative view to rationalizing design processes, called professional artistry, which is implicit professional knowledge. Using protocol studies in various disciplines, he demonstrated that professionals reflect-in-action while working and, as a result, learn and produce knowledge through doing (knowing-in-action). Since the 1980s, design theorists, researchers, and professionals have used Schön's work enthusiastically to articulate that designers learn more about their design process and design project as they design. Forty years after publication, The Reflective Practitioner continues to serve many design researchers as a foundation of learning from the experience of their design processes. However, this theory has limitations that must be recognized and addressed to stay relevant today. The Reflective Practitioner was written for individuals, whereas nowadays, designers often work in teams. The next step is to consider how individual reflections are shared and learned with other designers so that the team benefits from its collective reflective practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进唐纳德Schön的反思实践者:下一步何去何从?
1983年,Donald Schön出版了他的开创性著作《反思实践者:专业人士如何在行动中思考》。这本书出现在设计方法运动的高峰期,当时像l·布鲁斯·阿彻的《设计师的系统方法》和赫伯特·a·西蒙的《人工科学》这样的作品都主张将设计过程视为科学探究。巧合的是,Schön提出了另一种观点来合理化设计过程,称为专业艺术,这是隐性的专业知识。他利用不同学科的协议研究,证明了专业人员在工作时的“行动中反思”,结果是通过“行动中了解”来学习和创造知识。自20世纪80年代以来,设计理论家、研究人员和专业人士都热情地使用Schön的工作来阐明设计师在设计时更多地了解他们的设计过程和设计项目。出版四十年后,《反思实践者》继续为许多设计研究人员提供服务,作为从他们的设计过程中学习经验的基础。然而,这一理论有其局限性,必须加以认识和解决,才能在今天保持相关性。《反思性实践者》是为个人而写的,而现在,设计师经常在团队中工作。下一步是考虑如何与其他设计师分享和学习个人反思,以便团队从集体反思实践中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
期刊最新文献
Introduction The Intersection of Place and Game Design: The Case of Two Classic African Board Games The Disobedience of Design, (vol. Radical Thinkers in Design) Ethnographies of Unimagined Possibilities: Toward a Conversational Paradigm for Human-Centered Design Research Design and Making Things Better: Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1