Closing the Courthouse Doors

Erwin Chemerinsky
{"title":"Closing the Courthouse Doors","authors":"Erwin Chemerinsky","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1174-2015001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One crucial aspect of the Roberts Court's decision making has been its systematically closing the courthouse doors to those suing corporations, to those suing the government, to criminal defendants, and to plaintiffs in general. Taken together, these separate decisions have had a great cumulative impact in denying access to the courts to those who claim that their rights have been violated. The Roberts Court often has been able to achieve substantive results favored by conservatives through these procedural devices.","PeriodicalId":81088,"journal":{"name":"Denver University law review","volume":"90 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Denver University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1174-2015001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

One crucial aspect of the Roberts Court's decision making has been its systematically closing the courthouse doors to those suing corporations, to those suing the government, to criminal defendants, and to plaintiffs in general. Taken together, these separate decisions have had a great cumulative impact in denying access to the courts to those who claim that their rights have been violated. The Roberts Court often has been able to achieve substantive results favored by conservatives through these procedural devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关闭法院大门
罗伯茨法院决策的一个关键方面是,它系统地向起诉公司、起诉政府、刑事被告和一般原告关闭了法院的大门。这些单独的决定加在一起,在拒绝那些声称其权利受到侵犯的人诉诸法院方面产生了巨大的累积影响。罗伯茨最高法院经常能够通过这些程序手段取得保守派所青睐的实质性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change Challenges for Land Conservation: Rethinking Conservation Easements, Strategies, and Tools In Search of a Forum for the Families of the Guantanamo Disappeared Democracy, Violence, and Constitutional Revision in the Shadow of Democratic Revolution Theory Closing the Courthouse Doors Corporations and Autonomy Theories of Contract: A Critique of the New Lex Mercatoria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1