“ʼTis but the chance of War”: Fortune and Opportunity in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida

IF 0.1 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Explorations in Renaissance Culture Pub Date : 2016-03-15 DOI:10.1163/23526963-04201002
M. Ansaldo
{"title":"“ʼTis but the chance of War”: Fortune and Opportunity in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida","authors":"M. Ansaldo","doi":"10.1163/23526963-04201002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the representation of the interrelated notions of Fortune and Occasio in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida has been largely neglected by critics. This is particularly surprising because this play, where all that takes place is nothing “but the chance of war,” and characters’ efforts and expectations are often contradicted by the turns of events, seems to invite us to meditate upon what determines a successful outcome. This article shows that considering the concepts of Fortune and Occasion, and the imagery traditionally associated with them, can provide original critical perspectives on this play. The manner in which the characters refer to Fortune/ Occasio reveals the extent to which each of them is willing and capable of exercising agency. Sheer opportunism and brute force are what is required to win in the world of the play, where valor, honor and chivalry have become obsolete vestiges of a lost mythical past.","PeriodicalId":55910,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526963-04201002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-04201002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the representation of the interrelated notions of Fortune and Occasio in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida has been largely neglected by critics. This is particularly surprising because this play, where all that takes place is nothing “but the chance of war,” and characters’ efforts and expectations are often contradicted by the turns of events, seems to invite us to meditate upon what determines a successful outcome. This article shows that considering the concepts of Fortune and Occasion, and the imagery traditionally associated with them, can provide original critical perspectives on this play. The manner in which the characters refer to Fortune/ Occasio reveals the extent to which each of them is willing and capable of exercising agency. Sheer opportunism and brute force are what is required to win in the world of the play, where valor, honor and chivalry have become obsolete vestiges of a lost mythical past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这只是战争的机会”:莎士比亚《特洛伊罗斯与克蕾西达》中的命运与机遇
在莎士比亚的《特洛伊罗斯和克蕾西达》中,对命运和偶然性这两个相互关联的概念的研究在很大程度上被评论家所忽视。这是特别令人惊讶的,因为这部剧,所有发生的事情都是“战争的可能性”,人物的努力和期望经常与事件的转变相矛盾,似乎邀请我们思考是什么决定了一个成功的结果。本文表明,考虑命运和机遇的概念,以及传统上与之相关的意象,可以为这部戏剧提供原创的批评视角。人物提及命运/偶然性的方式揭示了他们每个人愿意和能够行使代理的程度。纯粹的机会主义和蛮力是在戏剧世界中取胜所需要的,在那里,英勇、荣誉和骑士精神已经成为一个消失的神话过去的过时遗迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Explorations in Renaissance Culture
Explorations in Renaissance Culture MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitating Reputation in Early Modern Venice: Pietro Zen as Repainter of History in Mamluk Damascus The Steadfast Loyalty of Mary, Countess of Shrewsbury, ‘the Only Contriver of Bedlam Opposition’: The SCRC Hunter Lecture, 2023 Fields Award 2022 From the Editor—Call for Papers and Fiftieth Anniversary of Explorations Popular Participation in Renaissance Siena’s Romanitas Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1