{"title":"Vasari: Between the Paragone and the Portraits of Himself","authors":"Émilie Passignat","doi":"10.1163/23526963-90000441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most critics, now and in the past, Giorgio Vasari is-first and foremost-the author of Le vite de' piu eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori. Vasari's artistic work-in particular, his paintinghas instead remained rather at the edge of the attention of scholars, when compared to the immense literature that continues to fuel the bibliography of his Le Vite, undoubtedly a work of undeniable and fundamental importance. Vasari's long and ambiguous fate among critics is marked by some bias: on the one hand, it stems from his parochialism in Le Vite, in favor of the Tuscans; on the other hand, it originates in the unanimous condemnation of Mannerism during past centuries, reevaluated only during the twentieth century. Yet Vasari's work has never remained unnoticed through the years; it has always become a fundamental point of reference. In 2011 on the occasion of the five hundreth anniversary of his birth, Vasari was heavily discussed with an approach much less bound and conditioned by the ideas of the critics in the past. There were so many celebrations organized in his honor that we can call it a pure and true consecration. Almost as it were a myth, and a myth is not born by itself Much of this success should primarily be attributed to the artist himself Vasari was an incomparable artisan of his own image, in passing it on to posterity, supported in this effort by his acquaintances he chose accurately, and later because of the work and contributions of his heirs, which are still unappreciated to this day.! In light of these observations, the scope of this essay is to highlight the fact that Vasari might not have entrusted the task of the artists' posthumous fame, and the claim of their new social status obtained in the sixteenth century, only to his Le Vite, but also how, through his entire artistic career and under different forms of communication, he was deeply committed and dedicated to achieving these goals. Indeed, this essay is about investigating Vasari's self-portrayal: how he describes himself in relation to his own art, thus proposing an interpretation more cross-sectional of the style in which Vasari builds his own image through the years; observing more attentively his portraits, self-portraits, and some of his works painted in residences in Arezzo and Florence; and finally, by considering the important work the Ragionamenti.","PeriodicalId":55910,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","volume":"39 1","pages":"85-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526963-90000441","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-90000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
For most critics, now and in the past, Giorgio Vasari is-first and foremost-the author of Le vite de' piu eccellenti pittori, scultori e architettori. Vasari's artistic work-in particular, his paintinghas instead remained rather at the edge of the attention of scholars, when compared to the immense literature that continues to fuel the bibliography of his Le Vite, undoubtedly a work of undeniable and fundamental importance. Vasari's long and ambiguous fate among critics is marked by some bias: on the one hand, it stems from his parochialism in Le Vite, in favor of the Tuscans; on the other hand, it originates in the unanimous condemnation of Mannerism during past centuries, reevaluated only during the twentieth century. Yet Vasari's work has never remained unnoticed through the years; it has always become a fundamental point of reference. In 2011 on the occasion of the five hundreth anniversary of his birth, Vasari was heavily discussed with an approach much less bound and conditioned by the ideas of the critics in the past. There were so many celebrations organized in his honor that we can call it a pure and true consecration. Almost as it were a myth, and a myth is not born by itself Much of this success should primarily be attributed to the artist himself Vasari was an incomparable artisan of his own image, in passing it on to posterity, supported in this effort by his acquaintances he chose accurately, and later because of the work and contributions of his heirs, which are still unappreciated to this day.! In light of these observations, the scope of this essay is to highlight the fact that Vasari might not have entrusted the task of the artists' posthumous fame, and the claim of their new social status obtained in the sixteenth century, only to his Le Vite, but also how, through his entire artistic career and under different forms of communication, he was deeply committed and dedicated to achieving these goals. Indeed, this essay is about investigating Vasari's self-portrayal: how he describes himself in relation to his own art, thus proposing an interpretation more cross-sectional of the style in which Vasari builds his own image through the years; observing more attentively his portraits, self-portraits, and some of his works painted in residences in Arezzo and Florence; and finally, by considering the important work the Ragionamenti.