{"title":"A simple method for estimating horizontal diffusivity","authors":"","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0097.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nA common dilemma for oceanographers is the choice of horizontal diffusivity. There is no single answer as we could argue that diffusion depends precisely on those processes that cannot be sampled or modeled. Here we propose the radial offset by diffusion (ROD) method as a simple model-dependent approach for estimating these coefficients, and show its application for the southwestern South Atlantic. The method compares actual displacements of field drifters with numerical trajectory predictions. The observed-predicted differences in radial positions (radial offsets), which respond to diffusive motions not captured by the numerical model, are reproduced with a one-dimensional radial-diffusive solution through a proper selection of the diffusion coefficient. The method is tested at eight depths, from the sea surface down to 2000 m, using several drifter datasets and the Parcels software applied to the GLORYS12v1 (1/12° daily) velocity outputs. In all cases the radial offsets show Gaussian distributions that are well reproduced by the radial diffusive solution. Maximum diffusivities of 4630-4980 m2 s−1 happen in the upper 200 m of the water column and minimum values of 1080-1270 m2 s−1 occur between 1400 and 2000 m. The 15-m diffusivity is fairly constant in latitude (3850 to 5270 m2 s−1), but the 1000-m diffusivity decreases from 1640-1820 m2 s−1 north of the Polar Front to 530 m2 s−1 south of the Southern Boundary. A comparison with other diffusivity studies validates the good adequacy of the ROD method for numerical and field applications.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0097.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A common dilemma for oceanographers is the choice of horizontal diffusivity. There is no single answer as we could argue that diffusion depends precisely on those processes that cannot be sampled or modeled. Here we propose the radial offset by diffusion (ROD) method as a simple model-dependent approach for estimating these coefficients, and show its application for the southwestern South Atlantic. The method compares actual displacements of field drifters with numerical trajectory predictions. The observed-predicted differences in radial positions (radial offsets), which respond to diffusive motions not captured by the numerical model, are reproduced with a one-dimensional radial-diffusive solution through a proper selection of the diffusion coefficient. The method is tested at eight depths, from the sea surface down to 2000 m, using several drifter datasets and the Parcels software applied to the GLORYS12v1 (1/12° daily) velocity outputs. In all cases the radial offsets show Gaussian distributions that are well reproduced by the radial diffusive solution. Maximum diffusivities of 4630-4980 m2 s−1 happen in the upper 200 m of the water column and minimum values of 1080-1270 m2 s−1 occur between 1400 and 2000 m. The 15-m diffusivity is fairly constant in latitude (3850 to 5270 m2 s−1), but the 1000-m diffusivity decreases from 1640-1820 m2 s−1 north of the Polar Front to 530 m2 s−1 south of the Southern Boundary. A comparison with other diffusivity studies validates the good adequacy of the ROD method for numerical and field applications.
对于海洋学家来说,选择水平扩散率是一个常见的难题。没有一个单一的答案,因为我们可以争辩说,扩散恰恰取决于那些无法采样或建模的过程。本文提出了径向扩散偏移(ROD)方法作为估算这些系数的一种简单的模式依赖方法,并展示了其在南大西洋西南部的应用。该方法将野外漂船的实际位移与数值轨迹预测结果进行了比较。观测到的和预测到的径向位置(径向偏移量)的差异,响应于数值模型没有捕捉到的扩散运动,通过适当选择扩散系数,用一维径向扩散解再现。该方法在8个深度进行了测试,从海面到2000米,使用了几个漂移数据集和应用于GLORYS12v1(1/12°每日)速度输出的包裹软件。在所有情况下,径向偏移量都显示高斯分布,这是由径向扩散解很好地再现的。最大扩散系数为4630-4980 m2 s -1,发生在水柱上方200 m处,最小值为1080-1270 m2 s -1,发生在1400 - 2000 m之间。15米的扩散率在纬度上是相当恒定的(3850 ~ 5270 m2 s -1),但1000米的扩散率从极锋以北的1640 ~ 1820 m2 s -1下降到南边界以南的530 m2 s -1。与其他扩散系数研究的比较验证了ROD方法在数值和现场应用中的良好充分性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.