Microscopic Basis of the Interacting Boson Model

T. Otsuka
{"title":"Microscopic Basis of the Interacting Boson Model","authors":"T. Otsuka","doi":"10.1143/PTPS.125.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The microscopic basis of the IBM is discussed in this paper, presenting a derivation of the IBM system from the multi-nucleon system. Although there could be different approaches to this goal as stated in the preface of this supplement, we focus on two approaches. One is the Otsuka-Arima-Iachello mapping, which works for the spherical and near-spherical nuclei. The other is a mapping for deformed nuclei. In this paper, we discuss mapping methods for deriving the Interacting Boson Model (IBM). l) We first present a mapping method for spherical and near-spherical nuclei, usually referred to as the Otsuka-Arima-Iachello (OAI) mapping. 2 ), 3 ) The OAI mapping is based on the seniority scheme as will be discussed in detail. This mapping has been developed so that realistic calculations can be carried out as presented in a subsequent paper. In this paper, the basic concepts of the mapping are discussed rather in detail. Furthermore, the proton-neutron Interacting Boson Model (IBM-2) is discussed as a natural consequence of this mapping. 2 ), 3 ) In the second half of this paper, a mapping method for strongly deformed nuclei 8 ) will be reviewed. Although this mapping is for deformed nuclei, it is somewhat related to the OAI mapping. The work on deformed nuclei is much before any sort of completion, and considerable effort should be made in the future. For this purpose, the Quantum Monte Carlo Diagonalization method proposed recently 4 )- 7 ) may be useful. When the IBM was proposed from the phenomenological viewpoint by Arima and Iachello, the microscopic picture of bosons of this model was not known as pointed out in the preface of this supplement. The microscopic theory has made a crucial contribution even to phenomenological studies by the IBM, also as mentioned in the preface. Before starting rather detailed discussions, it may be useful to overview relevant properties of the effective nucleon-nucleon interactions. The short-range nuclear force favors two nucleons lying close to each other. This means that, if the wave functions of the two neutrons have large spatial overlap, the matrix element of this interaction becomes larger. On the other hand, two identical fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state, and this is the case for two neutrons. The next optimum case for gaining energy is that the two neutrons are moving on the same orbital but in opposite directions. Because the direction is opposite, the quantum states of the two neutrons are different. In this case, the total angular momentum of the two-neutron system is zero, because the rotation is completely cancelled. In fact, the","PeriodicalId":20614,"journal":{"name":"Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.125.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The microscopic basis of the IBM is discussed in this paper, presenting a derivation of the IBM system from the multi-nucleon system. Although there could be different approaches to this goal as stated in the preface of this supplement, we focus on two approaches. One is the Otsuka-Arima-Iachello mapping, which works for the spherical and near-spherical nuclei. The other is a mapping for deformed nuclei. In this paper, we discuss mapping methods for deriving the Interacting Boson Model (IBM). l) We first present a mapping method for spherical and near-spherical nuclei, usually referred to as the Otsuka-Arima-Iachello (OAI) mapping. 2 ), 3 ) The OAI mapping is based on the seniority scheme as will be discussed in detail. This mapping has been developed so that realistic calculations can be carried out as presented in a subsequent paper. In this paper, the basic concepts of the mapping are discussed rather in detail. Furthermore, the proton-neutron Interacting Boson Model (IBM-2) is discussed as a natural consequence of this mapping. 2 ), 3 ) In the second half of this paper, a mapping method for strongly deformed nuclei 8 ) will be reviewed. Although this mapping is for deformed nuclei, it is somewhat related to the OAI mapping. The work on deformed nuclei is much before any sort of completion, and considerable effort should be made in the future. For this purpose, the Quantum Monte Carlo Diagonalization method proposed recently 4 )- 7 ) may be useful. When the IBM was proposed from the phenomenological viewpoint by Arima and Iachello, the microscopic picture of bosons of this model was not known as pointed out in the preface of this supplement. The microscopic theory has made a crucial contribution even to phenomenological studies by the IBM, also as mentioned in the preface. Before starting rather detailed discussions, it may be useful to overview relevant properties of the effective nucleon-nucleon interactions. The short-range nuclear force favors two nucleons lying close to each other. This means that, if the wave functions of the two neutrons have large spatial overlap, the matrix element of this interaction becomes larger. On the other hand, two identical fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state, and this is the case for two neutrons. The next optimum case for gaining energy is that the two neutrons are moving on the same orbital but in opposite directions. Because the direction is opposite, the quantum states of the two neutrons are different. In this case, the total angular momentum of the two-neutron system is zero, because the rotation is completely cancelled. In fact, the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相互作用玻色子模型的微观基础
本文讨论了IBM系统的微观基础,并从多核子系统推导出IBM系统。虽然可以有不同的方法来实现这一目标,如在本补充的序言中所述,我们主要关注两种方法。一种是大冢-阿里马-伊切罗映射,它适用于球形和近球形核。另一个是形变核的映射。本文讨论了导出相互作用玻色子模型(IBM)的映射方法。l)首先提出了一种球形和近球形核的映射方法,通常称为Otsuka-Arima-Iachello (OAI)映射。2), 3) OAI映射基于资历方案,这将在后面详细讨论。这种映射已经发展,以便实际的计算可以进行,在随后的论文中提出。本文较为详细地讨论了映射的基本概念。此外,质子-中子相互作用玻色子模型(IBM-2)作为这种映射的自然结果进行了讨论。2), 3)在本文的后半部分,将回顾强形变核的映射方法8)。虽然这种映射是针对变形核的,但它与OAI映射有一定的关系。关于变形核的工作还远远没有完成,未来还需要付出相当大的努力。为此,最近提出的量子蒙特卡罗对角化方法(4)- 7)可能有用。当Arima和Iachello从现象学的观点提出IBM模型时,正如本增编的前言所指出的那样,该模型的玻色子的微观图像并不为人所知。微观理论甚至对IBM的现象学研究做出了至关重要的贡献,正如序言中提到的那样。在开始相当详细的讨论之前,概述有效核子-核子相互作用的有关性质可能是有用的。短程核力有利于两个核子靠得很近。这意味着,如果两个中子的波函数有很大的空间重叠,这种相互作用的矩阵元素就会变大。另一方面,两个相同的费米子不能占据相同的量子态,这是两个中子的情况。下一个获得能量的最佳情况是,两个中子在相同的轨道上运动,但方向相反。因为方向相反,两个中子的量子态是不同的。在这种情况下,双中子系统的总角动量为零,因为旋转完全抵消了。事实上,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conditional Probability in Physics The Non-Locality of Force Deformable Sphere Model of Elementary Particles and the Origin of Internal Symmetries Role of Partially Conserved Axial-Vector Current in the πµ2 and Kµ2 Decays Baryon Structure and Electromagnetic Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1