Arthropod richness in roadside verges in the Netherlands

J. Noordijk, I. Raemakers, A. P. Schaffers, K. Sykora
{"title":"Arthropod richness in roadside verges in the Netherlands","authors":"J. Noordijk, I. Raemakers, A. P. Schaffers, K. Sykora","doi":"10.1163/187498309X440085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urbanisation and intensification of agriculture has led to large scale destruction of natural and semi-natural areas in Western Europe. Consequentially, the conservation of biodiversity in small landscape units has become a matter of increasing urgency. In this paper, we inventoried the arthropod diversity in roadside verges in the Netherlands and studied the relative importance of these linear elements. In addition, the occurrence of arthropods in roadside verges in other countries was studied by literature research. In the period 1998-2008, we sampled 57 roadside verges. This was mainly done by pitfall trapping, using sweeping nets and insect nets, and by sight observations. For several arthropod groups the majority of the Dutch indigenous species was sampled: ants (56% of the indigenous species), grasshoppers (53%), harvestmen (67%) and two spider families (52% and 68%). For ground beetles, weevils, butterflies, bees, hoverflies and three other spider families, values between 18–41% were found. Considering that only a minute fraction of the vast network of roadsides was sampled, these figures are remarkably high. Roadside verges are occasionally reported to act as dispersal corridors for exotic species, but this could not be confirmed for arthropods in the Netherlands. Several of the arthropod species inventoried in the Dutch verges are classified as threatened: five grasshopper and eleven bee species appear on national Red Lists and six ant species on the IUCN Red List. Also, in several other countries roadside verges in intensively used landscapes appear to offer opportunities for arthropod conservation. We conclude that, if rightly managed, roadside verges can serve as an important and valuable arthropod habitat. Therefore, we strongly recommend taking always into account the conservation of these arthropod assemblages during planning and actual management of roadside verges.","PeriodicalId":88711,"journal":{"name":"Terrestrial arthropod reviews","volume":"2 1","pages":"63-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187498309X440085","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrestrial arthropod reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187498309X440085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Urbanisation and intensification of agriculture has led to large scale destruction of natural and semi-natural areas in Western Europe. Consequentially, the conservation of biodiversity in small landscape units has become a matter of increasing urgency. In this paper, we inventoried the arthropod diversity in roadside verges in the Netherlands and studied the relative importance of these linear elements. In addition, the occurrence of arthropods in roadside verges in other countries was studied by literature research. In the period 1998-2008, we sampled 57 roadside verges. This was mainly done by pitfall trapping, using sweeping nets and insect nets, and by sight observations. For several arthropod groups the majority of the Dutch indigenous species was sampled: ants (56% of the indigenous species), grasshoppers (53%), harvestmen (67%) and two spider families (52% and 68%). For ground beetles, weevils, butterflies, bees, hoverflies and three other spider families, values between 18–41% were found. Considering that only a minute fraction of the vast network of roadsides was sampled, these figures are remarkably high. Roadside verges are occasionally reported to act as dispersal corridors for exotic species, but this could not be confirmed for arthropods in the Netherlands. Several of the arthropod species inventoried in the Dutch verges are classified as threatened: five grasshopper and eleven bee species appear on national Red Lists and six ant species on the IUCN Red List. Also, in several other countries roadside verges in intensively used landscapes appear to offer opportunities for arthropod conservation. We conclude that, if rightly managed, roadside verges can serve as an important and valuable arthropod habitat. Therefore, we strongly recommend taking always into account the conservation of these arthropod assemblages during planning and actual management of roadside verges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰路边边缘节肢动物丰富度
城市化和农业集约化导致了西欧自然和半自然地区的大规模破坏。因此,保护小型景观单位的生物多样性已成为一个日益紧迫的问题。本文调查了荷兰路边边缘节肢动物的多样性,并研究了这些线性要素的相对重要性。此外,通过文献研究,对其他国家路边边缘节肢动物的发生情况进行了研究。在1998-2008年期间,我们对57个路边边缘进行了采样。这主要是通过陷阱诱捕、使用扫网和防虫网以及目视观察来完成的。对于几个节肢动物类群,大多数荷兰本土物种被采样:蚂蚁(56%的本土物种),蚱蜢(53%),收割机(67%)和两个蜘蛛科(52%和68%)。在地面甲虫、象鼻虫、蝴蝶、蜜蜂、食蚜蝇和其他三个蜘蛛科中,发现的值在18-41%之间。考虑到在庞大的道路网络中只有一小部分被采样,这些数字非常高。路边的边缘偶尔被报道为外来物种的扩散走廊,但这在荷兰的节肢动物中无法得到证实。在荷兰边缘发现的节肢动物中有几种被列为濒危物种:五种蚱蜢和十一种蜜蜂被列入国家红色名录,六种蚂蚁被列入世界自然保护联盟红色名录。此外,在其他几个国家,密集利用景观的路边边缘似乎为节肢动物保护提供了机会。我们的结论是,如果管理得当,路边边缘可以作为一个重要的和有价值的节肢动物栖息地。因此,我们强烈建议在规划和实际管理道路边缘时始终考虑这些节肢动物群落的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cetoniinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) diversity of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda and surrounding areas Conservation status of United States tiger beetles Geographic distribution of Gnamptogenys hartmani (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), an agro-predator that attacks fungus-growing ants A heartfelt farewell to the readers and friends of: Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews Geographic distribution of Strumigenys louisianae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1