Popular Support for Grassroots Self-Government in Urban China

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Modern China Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI:10.1177/0097700407303966
Jie Chen, Chunlong Lu, Yiyin Yang
{"title":"Popular Support for Grassroots Self-Government in Urban China","authors":"Jie Chen, Chunlong Lu, Yiyin Yang","doi":"10.1177/0097700407303966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the post-Mao reforms began, the Chinese central government has made efforts to revitalize the grassroots self-government system in urban areas in order to cope with the resulting sociopolitical changes. In 2000 the government stepped up its efforts by changing the old Residential Committee (jumin weiyuanhui, or RC) to the new Community Residents' Committee (shequ jumin weiyuanhui, or CRC) and by giving the latter more autonomy. Survey data that the authors collected in the urban areas of Beijing in 2004 indicate that most of their respondents supported the new CRCs and the current self-government system as a whole. Moreover, the authors found that urban residents' subjective orientations—such as their assessment of existing CRCs' performance, belief in democratic principles, sense of political efficacy, and life satisfaction—significantly influenced their support for the system; the type of housing complex was a sociopolitical contextual factor that also helped shape their support. These findings have important political implications for the future viability of the urban self-government system.","PeriodicalId":47030,"journal":{"name":"Modern China","volume":"33 1","pages":"505 - 528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0097700407303966","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern China","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700407303966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the post-Mao reforms began, the Chinese central government has made efforts to revitalize the grassroots self-government system in urban areas in order to cope with the resulting sociopolitical changes. In 2000 the government stepped up its efforts by changing the old Residential Committee (jumin weiyuanhui, or RC) to the new Community Residents' Committee (shequ jumin weiyuanhui, or CRC) and by giving the latter more autonomy. Survey data that the authors collected in the urban areas of Beijing in 2004 indicate that most of their respondents supported the new CRCs and the current self-government system as a whole. Moreover, the authors found that urban residents' subjective orientations—such as their assessment of existing CRCs' performance, belief in democratic principles, sense of political efficacy, and life satisfaction—significantly influenced their support for the system; the type of housing complex was a sociopolitical contextual factor that also helped shape their support. These findings have important political implications for the future viability of the urban self-government system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国城市基层自治的民意支持
自从后毛改革开始以来,中国中央政府一直在努力振兴城市地区的基层自治制度,以应对由此产生的社会政治变化。2000年,政府加大了力度,将原有的居民委员会(居委会)改为新的社区居民委员会(居委会),并赋予后者更多的自治权。作者于2004年在北京城区收集的调查数据表明,大多数受访者支持新的地方自治委员会和现行的整体自治制度。此外,作者发现,城市居民的主观取向,如他们对现有社区委员会绩效的评估、对民主原则的信念、政治效能感和生活满意度,显著影响了他们对该制度的支持;住宅综合体的类型是一个社会政治背景因素,也有助于塑造他们的支持。这些发现对未来城市自治制度的可行性具有重要的政治意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern China
Modern China AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Published for over thirty years, Modern China has been an indispensable source of scholarship in history and the social sciences on late-imperial, twentieth-century, and present-day China. Modern China presents scholarship based on new research or research that is devoted to new interpretations, new questions, and new answers to old questions. Spanning the full sweep of Chinese studies of six centuries, Modern China encourages scholarship that crosses over the old "premodern/modern" and "modern/contemporary" divides.
期刊最新文献
Institutionalization within Revolutionary Crisis: The Chinese Communist Party’s Radio Communications and Reconnaissance, 1933–1936 Speaking with Devils: Sino-European Vernaculars and Translingual Communication before the Treaty Ports Going Local: Policy Intellectuals’ Adaptive Strategies under Xi Jinping Cross-Boundary Subsumption: Toward a Political Economy of Platform Labor Natural Embeddedness, Place Attachment, and Local Opposition to Developmental Projects: A Polanyian Analysis of the Origins of Preemptive Environmental Protests in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1