Accessible, Transparent, Progressive: Conceptualising the Militarisation of Digital Space Through the Social Media Presence of Arms Manufacturers

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Millennium - Journal of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/03058298221137930
N. Jester
{"title":"Accessible, Transparent, Progressive: Conceptualising the Militarisation of Digital Space Through the Social Media Presence of Arms Manufacturers","authors":"N. Jester","doi":"10.1177/03058298221137930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arms sales cause serious harm and the public is – on some level – aware of this, yet their sale continues apace. Militarisation is the engendering of support for war, broadly understood, and this includes the manufacture/sale of weapons. This article examines the Twitter feeds of three large US arms manufacturers: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman (as part of a larger project where approximately 900 tweets were examined). It argues that productive tensions of exposure (knowing) and revelation (societal acknowledgement) engender militarisation within arms manufacturers’ Twitter feeds. It finds that arms manufacturers represent themselves as accessible/transparent through regular updates and high volumes of information. They also distract from the violence of their products by presenting themselves as drivers of human progress, which occurs in social, environmental and technological dimensions. Taken as a whole, the representations of accessibility and distracting content on social media function to facilitate the arms trade in this case. Accessible, transparente, progressive : conceptualiser la militarisation de l’espace numérique à travers la présence de fabricants d’armes sur les réseaux sociaux","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"463 - 488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298221137930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Arms sales cause serious harm and the public is – on some level – aware of this, yet their sale continues apace. Militarisation is the engendering of support for war, broadly understood, and this includes the manufacture/sale of weapons. This article examines the Twitter feeds of three large US arms manufacturers: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman (as part of a larger project where approximately 900 tweets were examined). It argues that productive tensions of exposure (knowing) and revelation (societal acknowledgement) engender militarisation within arms manufacturers’ Twitter feeds. It finds that arms manufacturers represent themselves as accessible/transparent through regular updates and high volumes of information. They also distract from the violence of their products by presenting themselves as drivers of human progress, which occurs in social, environmental and technological dimensions. Taken as a whole, the representations of accessibility and distracting content on social media function to facilitate the arms trade in this case. Accessible, transparente, progressive : conceptualiser la militarisation de l’espace numérique à travers la présence de fabricants d’armes sur les réseaux sociaux
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无障碍、透明、进步:通过武器制造商的社交媒体存在概念化数字空间军事化
军售造成严重伤害,公众在某种程度上意识到这一点,但军售仍在迅速进行。军事化是对战争的支持,广泛理解,这包括制造/销售武器。本文研究了美国三家大型武器制造商的Twitter消息:洛克希德·马丁公司、雷神公司和诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司(作为一个更大项目的一部分,该项目研究了大约900条推文)。它认为,暴露(知道)和揭露(社会承认)之间的生产性紧张关系,在武器制造商的Twitter feed中产生了军事化。报告发现,武器制造商通过定期更新和提供大量信息,将自己描述为可访问/透明的。他们还通过将自己呈现为人类进步的驱动力,在社会、环境和技术方面转移人们对其产品暴力的注意力。从整体上看,社交媒体上的可访问性和分散注意力的内容在本案中起到了促进武器贸易的作用。无障碍的、透明的、进步的:概念化的、军事化的、空间的、空间的、空间的、空间的、空间的、空间的、空间的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Contending American Visions of North Korea: The Mission Civilisatrice versus Realpolitik Affect, Aesthetics, and Sovereign Attachments The Violence of Settler Imperialism – and Why the Concept of Coloniality Cannot Grasp It The Affective Economies of Sovereignty: Desire and Identification The International Turn in Far-Right Studies: A Critical Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1