Stitching Together Creativity and Responsibility

Q2 Arts and Humanities Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Pub Date : 2016-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0270467616646637
M. Halpern, Jathan Sadowski, J. Eschrich, E. Finn, D. Guston
{"title":"Stitching Together Creativity and Responsibility","authors":"M. Halpern, Jathan Sadowski, J. Eschrich, E. Finn, D. Guston","doi":"10.1177/0270467616646637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as an “object of care” for use in examining the relationship between creativity and responsibility in the sciences and beyond. Through three short sketches from different disciplinary lenses—literature, science and technology studies, and feminist studies—readers get a sense of the different ways scholars might consider Shelley’s text as an object of care. Through an analysis and synthesis of these three sketches, the authors illustrate the value of such an object in thinking about broad cultural issues. The article acts as a kind of boundary object by creating distinct, yet overlapping narratives from an object that is owned by many social worlds. The three sketches reveal Frankenstein as a thoughtful consideration about what it means to care for, or fail to care for, one’s creation, rather than as a cautionary tale about the evils of scientific hubris. Although infrastructures at universities often prevent interdisciplinary dialogue, the article concludes that purposeful boundary objects created around objects of care like Frankenstein can help build bridges and create shared meanings for new interdisciplinary spaces.","PeriodicalId":38848,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","volume":"102 1","pages":"49 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0270467616646637","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616646637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This article explores Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as an “object of care” for use in examining the relationship between creativity and responsibility in the sciences and beyond. Through three short sketches from different disciplinary lenses—literature, science and technology studies, and feminist studies—readers get a sense of the different ways scholars might consider Shelley’s text as an object of care. Through an analysis and synthesis of these three sketches, the authors illustrate the value of such an object in thinking about broad cultural issues. The article acts as a kind of boundary object by creating distinct, yet overlapping narratives from an object that is owned by many social worlds. The three sketches reveal Frankenstein as a thoughtful consideration about what it means to care for, or fail to care for, one’s creation, rather than as a cautionary tale about the evils of scientific hubris. Although infrastructures at universities often prevent interdisciplinary dialogue, the article concludes that purposeful boundary objects created around objects of care like Frankenstein can help build bridges and create shared meanings for new interdisciplinary spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将创造力和责任感结合在一起
本文将玛丽·雪莱的《弗兰肯斯坦》作为一个“关注对象”,用于研究科学领域及其他领域的创造力与责任之间的关系。通过三个来自不同学科视角——文学、科学技术研究和女权主义研究——的小品,读者可以了解到学者们将雪莱的文本视为关注对象的不同方式。通过对这三个草图的分析和综合,作者说明了这样一个对象在思考广泛的文化问题时的价值。文章作为一种边界对象,从许多社会世界所拥有的对象中创造出独特而又重叠的叙事。这三幅草图表明,《弗兰肯斯坦》是对关心或不关心自己的创造物意味着什么的深思熟虑,而不是一个关于科学傲慢的邪恶的警示故事。虽然大学的基础设施经常阻碍跨学科的对话,但文章的结论是,在像弗兰肯斯坦这样的关怀对象周围创建的有目的的边界物体可以帮助建立桥梁,并为新的跨学科空间创造共享的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs Intellectual Virtues and Scientific Endeavor: A Reflection on the Commitments Inherent in Generating and Possessing Knowledge How do Researchers Use Social Media for Science Communication? Designing a Mobile-Messaging App-Based Teachers’ Community of Practice in India Ethics in Science and Technology Policy-Making: A Proposed Normative Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1