The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States

IF 5.1 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE ACS Macro Letters Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1177/1529100615617791
T. Tyler, P. A. Goff, R. MacCoun
{"title":"The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States","authors":"T. Tyler, P. A. Goff, R. MacCoun","doi":"10.1177/1529100615617791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The May 2015 release of the report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing highlighted a fundamental change in the issues dominating discussions about policing in America. That change has moved discussions away from a focus on what is legal or effective in crime control and toward a concern for how the actions of the police influence public trust and confidence in the police. This shift in discourse has been motivated by two factors—first, the recognition by public officials that increases in the professionalism of the police and dramatic declines in the rate of crime have not led to increases in police legitimacy, and second, greater awareness of the limits of the dominant coercive model of policing and of the benefits of an alternative and more consensual model based on public trust and confidence in the police and legal system. Psychological research has played an important role in legitimating this change in the way policymakers think about policing by demonstrating that perceived legitimacy shapes a set of law-related behaviors as well as or better than concerns about the risk of punishment. Those behaviors include compliance with the law and cooperation with legal authorities. These findings demonstrate that legal authorities gain by a focus on legitimacy. Psychological research has further contributed by articulating and demonstrating empirical support for a central role of procedural justice in shaping legitimacy, providing legal authorities with a clear road map of strategies for creating and maintaining public trust. Given evidence of the benefits of legitimacy and a set of guidelines concerning its antecedents, policymakers have increasingly focused on the question of public trust when considering issues in policing. The acceptance of a legitimacy-based consensual model of police authority building on theories and research studies originating within psychology illustrates how psychology can contribute to the development of evidence-based policies in the field of criminal law.","PeriodicalId":18,"journal":{"name":"ACS Macro Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100615617791","citationCount":"204","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Macro Letters","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 204

Abstract

The May 2015 release of the report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing highlighted a fundamental change in the issues dominating discussions about policing in America. That change has moved discussions away from a focus on what is legal or effective in crime control and toward a concern for how the actions of the police influence public trust and confidence in the police. This shift in discourse has been motivated by two factors—first, the recognition by public officials that increases in the professionalism of the police and dramatic declines in the rate of crime have not led to increases in police legitimacy, and second, greater awareness of the limits of the dominant coercive model of policing and of the benefits of an alternative and more consensual model based on public trust and confidence in the police and legal system. Psychological research has played an important role in legitimating this change in the way policymakers think about policing by demonstrating that perceived legitimacy shapes a set of law-related behaviors as well as or better than concerns about the risk of punishment. Those behaviors include compliance with the law and cooperation with legal authorities. These findings demonstrate that legal authorities gain by a focus on legitimacy. Psychological research has further contributed by articulating and demonstrating empirical support for a central role of procedural justice in shaping legitimacy, providing legal authorities with a clear road map of strategies for creating and maintaining public trust. Given evidence of the benefits of legitimacy and a set of guidelines concerning its antecedents, policymakers have increasingly focused on the question of public trust when considering issues in policing. The acceptance of a legitimacy-based consensual model of police authority building on theories and research studies originating within psychology illustrates how psychology can contribute to the development of evidence-based policies in the field of criminal law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理科学对美国警务的影响
2015年5月发布的总统21世纪警务特别工作组报告强调了主导美国警务讨论的问题的根本变化。这一变化使讨论从关注什么是合法或有效的犯罪控制,转向关注警察的行动如何影响公众对警察的信任和信心。这种话语的转变是由两个因素驱动的:首先,政府官员认识到警察专业性的提高和犯罪率的急剧下降并没有导致警察合法性的增加;其次,人们更加意识到主导的强制性警务模式的局限性,以及基于公众对警察和法律制度的信任和信心的另一种更一致的模式的好处。心理学研究在使政策制定者思考警务方式的这种变化合法化方面发挥了重要作用,它表明,感知到的合法性会影响一系列与法律相关的行为,或者比担心受到惩罚的风险更好。这些行为包括遵守法律和与法律当局合作。这些发现表明,法律当局通过关注合法性而获益。心理学研究通过阐明和证明程序正义在形成合法性方面的核心作用的经验支持,为法律当局提供了建立和维持公众信任的明确战略路线图,进一步作出了贡献。鉴于合法性的好处和一套关于其前身的指导方针的证据,政策制定者在考虑警务问题时越来越关注公众信任的问题。接受基于合法性的警察权威共识模式,建立在源自心理学的理论和研究的基础上,说明心理学如何有助于在刑法领域制定基于证据的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACS Macro Letters publishes research in all areas of contemporary soft matter science in which macromolecules play a key role, including nanotechnology, self-assembly, supramolecular chemistry, biomaterials, energy generation and storage, and renewable/sustainable materials. Submissions to ACS Macro Letters should justify clearly the rapid disclosure of the key elements of the study. The scope of the journal includes high-impact research of broad interest in all areas of polymer science and engineering, including cross-disciplinary research that interfaces with polymer science. With the launch of ACS Macro Letters, all Communications that were formerly published in Macromolecules and Biomacromolecules will be published as Letters in ACS Macro Letters.
期刊最新文献
Modeling of Chain Sequence Length and Distribution in Random Copolyesters Light-Driven Organocatalyzed Controlled Radical Copolymerization of (Perfluoroalkyl)ethylenes and Vinyl Esters/Amides Circular Cross-Linked Polyethylene Enabled by In-Chain Ketones. High-Entropy Strategy Flattening Lithium Ion Migration Energy Landscape to Enhance the Conductivity of Garnet-Type Solid-State Electrolytes Fast and generalizable micromagnetic simulation with deep neural nets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1