Rethinking leadership learning in postgraduate public management programmes

IF 1.5 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Public Administration Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI:10.1177/0144739413479198
I. Briggs, J. Raine
{"title":"Rethinking leadership learning in postgraduate public management programmes","authors":"I. Briggs, J. Raine","doi":"10.1177/0144739413479198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leadership forms a key component of the curriculum of most Master of Public Administration and other public management programmes, usually doing so on the basis of assumptions that leadership is (a) both a subject and a responsibility that all such students might expect to embrace in the course of their careers; and (b) in some respects at least, it is distinctive and different in public service settings than in the commercial world from which the models and conceptualisations tend to be mostly drawn. This article, however, also starts from the proposition that leadership is best learned not by being “taught” in a traditional classroom context, but by exploration of and reflection on practical experiences and through developing the ability to “internalise” the behavioural processes involved, both positive and negative. What is needed, we therefore argue, is an approach that offers students opportunities to learn not only through the imparting of theoretical perspectives on the subject but also by impacting upon their self-awareness as a result of a focus on experience of leadership in practice. In the article we describe and reflect upon an experimental initiative of this nature; one that coupled an Action Learning (AL) approach with a more structured educational framework to help practitioner students identify and explore their Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) and to develop notions of the nature of leadership that they might aspire personally to practice.","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"31 1","pages":"107 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0144739413479198","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739413479198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Leadership forms a key component of the curriculum of most Master of Public Administration and other public management programmes, usually doing so on the basis of assumptions that leadership is (a) both a subject and a responsibility that all such students might expect to embrace in the course of their careers; and (b) in some respects at least, it is distinctive and different in public service settings than in the commercial world from which the models and conceptualisations tend to be mostly drawn. This article, however, also starts from the proposition that leadership is best learned not by being “taught” in a traditional classroom context, but by exploration of and reflection on practical experiences and through developing the ability to “internalise” the behavioural processes involved, both positive and negative. What is needed, we therefore argue, is an approach that offers students opportunities to learn not only through the imparting of theoretical perspectives on the subject but also by impacting upon their self-awareness as a result of a focus on experience of leadership in practice. In the article we describe and reflect upon an experimental initiative of this nature; one that coupled an Action Learning (AL) approach with a more structured educational framework to help practitioner students identify and explore their Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) and to develop notions of the nature of leadership that they might aspire personally to practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考研究生公共管理课程中的领导力学习
领导能力是大多数公共行政硕士和其他公共管理课程的一个关键组成部分,通常这样做是基于这样的假设:领导能力既是一门学科,也是一种责任,所有这些学生都可能期望在他们的职业生涯中接受这一学科;(b)至少在某些方面,它在公共服务环境中与在商业世界中不同,而商业世界往往是模型和概念的主要来源。然而,这篇文章也从这样一个命题开始,即最好的领导力学习不是通过在传统的课堂环境中“教授”,而是通过对实践经验的探索和反思,以及通过发展“内化”所涉及的行为过程的能力,无论是积极的还是消极的。因此,我们认为,需要的是一种方法,为学生提供学习的机会,不仅通过传授关于这一主题的理论观点,而且通过影响他们的自我意识,因为他们专注于实践中的领导经验。在这篇文章中,我们描述并反思了这种性质的实验主动性;它将行动学习(AL)方法与更结构化的教育框架相结合,帮助实践者学生识别和探索他们的内隐领导理论(ILTs),并发展他们可能渴望亲自实践的领导本质的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Public Administration
Teaching Public Administration EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.
期刊最新文献
Does Gen-AI have a role in public affairs education? Let’s ask ChatGPT Minding the gap between public administration curriculum and practice: The studio of public reasoning Book Review: Trump and the bureaucrats: The fate of neutral competence Assessing the integration of AI competencies in undergraduate public administration curricula in selected South African higher education institutions Training and retraining civil servants in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1