From medically assisted procreation to euthanasia: a modern way to deal with ethical dilemmas in modern medicine.

Y. Englert
{"title":"From medically assisted procreation to euthanasia: a modern way to deal with ethical dilemmas in modern medicine.","authors":"Y. Englert","doi":"10.1179/HRGE.3.2.221056J087M10865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSince neither moralists nor jurists have been able to cope with the philosophical questions raised by the technological advances and changing attitudes in health care, a new social structure was created in the seventies known as bioethics. Since then, bioethics has been predominantly used as a new process to express moral rules and repress social evolutions in extremely sensitive fields in society such as assisted procreation techniques and new family planning, sexual abuse of children and sexual liberation, palliative care, euthanasia and quality of life and death.Using examples at the extremities of life (in vitro fertilisation and euthanasia) it will be demonstrated that no single approach to bioethics exists which is often confused with the concept of morals or laws. Bioethics is by essence conflictual and must be used to analyse and understand how the social evolution interacts with the technological advances.A position supported by principles of equality of access, and the respect of autonom...","PeriodicalId":81225,"journal":{"name":"European journal of genetics in society : an ethical approach to genetics","volume":"3 2 1","pages":"22-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/HRGE.3.2.221056J087M10865","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of genetics in society : an ethical approach to genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/HRGE.3.2.221056J087M10865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractSince neither moralists nor jurists have been able to cope with the philosophical questions raised by the technological advances and changing attitudes in health care, a new social structure was created in the seventies known as bioethics. Since then, bioethics has been predominantly used as a new process to express moral rules and repress social evolutions in extremely sensitive fields in society such as assisted procreation techniques and new family planning, sexual abuse of children and sexual liberation, palliative care, euthanasia and quality of life and death.Using examples at the extremities of life (in vitro fertilisation and euthanasia) it will be demonstrated that no single approach to bioethics exists which is often confused with the concept of morals or laws. Bioethics is by essence conflictual and must be used to analyse and understand how the social evolution interacts with the technological advances.A position supported by principles of equality of access, and the respect of autonom...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从医学辅助生育到安乐死:处理现代医学伦理困境的现代方法。
摘要由于道德家和法学家都无法应对技术进步和卫生保健态度变化所带来的哲学问题,一种新的社会结构在70年代被创造出来,称为生物伦理学。此后,在辅助生殖技术和新计划生育、儿童性虐待和性解放、姑息治疗、安乐死和生死质量等社会极端敏感领域,生物伦理学主要被用作表达道德规则和压制社会演变的新过程。使用生命的极端(体外受精和安乐死)的例子将证明,没有单一的生物伦理学方法存在,这往往与道德或法律的概念相混淆。生物伦理学本质上是矛盾的,必须用来分析和理解社会进化如何与技术进步相互作用。这一立场得到机会平等和尊重自主权原则的支持……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Against experimentation on human embryos. A sociological perspective on genetic screening. From medically assisted procreation to euthanasia: a modern way to deal with ethical dilemmas in modern medicine. An historical development of patenting microorganisms and genetically engineered animals in the USA and Europe. An historical development of patenting microorganisms and genetically engineered animals in the USA and Europe. Part 2. Developments in the EU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1