{"title":"Introduction: Open Societies and the Study of Mass Communication","authors":"P. Bakker, Special Issue","doi":"10.1177/17480485020640050101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European Communist states did not only affect the political sphere. Scholars from different disciplines soon became interested in these new ‘transitional’ societies. These societies represented a paradoxical model of society that was virtual unknown so far: a postCommunist power structure with a capitalist economy. Mass communication scientists were very interested in this new model; how for instance could the media play an active role (independent, professional, with full freedom of speech) when they still were subject to traditional government pressures and control? These sorts of questions were addressed in four different expert meetings that were organized by the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University and the Amsterdam School of Communications Research, ASCoR. Scholars from these institutions and other experts from all over the world attended these meetings. The concept of the ‘open society’ developed by Karl Popper in the 1940s and revitalized by George Soros in the 1990s served as a basis for these discussions. In the first article in this issue, ‘With Two Feet on Firm Ground and Diverse Heads Up in the Air: Conclusions of Four Expert Meetings on Media and Open Societies in East and West’, Richard van der Wurff summarizes the results of four years of Open Societies Expert Meetings. He shows how the central theme of the meetings has moved from an initial focus on government policies and a balance of power between media and societal organizations and groups, to internal motivations for innovation, tolerance and appreciation of diversity. In the last (2001) meeting much attention was given to the role of the Internet in modern society, however it is not yet clear if this new medium will be a solution for the problems modern societies face. The other six contributions in this issue focus on the role of the Internet. Yassen Zassoursky takes a theoretical and normative approach in ‘Media and Communications as the Vehicle of the Open Society: The Internet and the Global Society’. He envisions the open society concept as one of the few possible means of solving the problems modern society is facing these days, especially in the aftermath of the attacks of 11 September. He combines and compares the idea of the open society with concepts like the information society, the civil society, the knowledge society, the consumerist society, the permissive society, and religious and ideological fundamentalism. In ‘The European Information Society: Much Ado About Nothing?’, Jan GAZETTE: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMMUNICATION STUDIES","PeriodicalId":84790,"journal":{"name":"Gazette","volume":"64 1","pages":"405 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17480485020640050101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European Communist states did not only affect the political sphere. Scholars from different disciplines soon became interested in these new ‘transitional’ societies. These societies represented a paradoxical model of society that was virtual unknown so far: a postCommunist power structure with a capitalist economy. Mass communication scientists were very interested in this new model; how for instance could the media play an active role (independent, professional, with full freedom of speech) when they still were subject to traditional government pressures and control? These sorts of questions were addressed in four different expert meetings that were organized by the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University and the Amsterdam School of Communications Research, ASCoR. Scholars from these institutions and other experts from all over the world attended these meetings. The concept of the ‘open society’ developed by Karl Popper in the 1940s and revitalized by George Soros in the 1990s served as a basis for these discussions. In the first article in this issue, ‘With Two Feet on Firm Ground and Diverse Heads Up in the Air: Conclusions of Four Expert Meetings on Media and Open Societies in East and West’, Richard van der Wurff summarizes the results of four years of Open Societies Expert Meetings. He shows how the central theme of the meetings has moved from an initial focus on government policies and a balance of power between media and societal organizations and groups, to internal motivations for innovation, tolerance and appreciation of diversity. In the last (2001) meeting much attention was given to the role of the Internet in modern society, however it is not yet clear if this new medium will be a solution for the problems modern societies face. The other six contributions in this issue focus on the role of the Internet. Yassen Zassoursky takes a theoretical and normative approach in ‘Media and Communications as the Vehicle of the Open Society: The Internet and the Global Society’. He envisions the open society concept as one of the few possible means of solving the problems modern society is facing these days, especially in the aftermath of the attacks of 11 September. He combines and compares the idea of the open society with concepts like the information society, the civil society, the knowledge society, the consumerist society, the permissive society, and religious and ideological fundamentalism. In ‘The European Information Society: Much Ado About Nothing?’, Jan GAZETTE: THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMMUNICATION STUDIES
苏联和东欧共产主义国家的崩溃不仅影响了政治领域。不同学科的学者很快对这些新的“过渡”社会产生了兴趣。这些社会代表了一种迄今为止几乎不为人知的矛盾的社会模式:后共产主义的权力结构与资本主义经济。大众传播科学家对这种新模式非常感兴趣;例如,当媒体仍然受到传统的政府压力和控制时,它们如何发挥积极作用(独立、专业、有充分的言论自由)?莫斯科国立大学新闻学院和阿姆斯特丹通讯研究学院组织了四次不同的专家会议,讨论了这类问题。来自这些机构的学者和来自世界各地的其他专家参加了这些会议。卡尔·波普尔(Karl Popper)在20世纪40年代提出的“开放社会”概念,在20世纪90年代被乔治·索罗斯(George Soros)复兴,成为这些讨论的基础。在本期的第一篇文章《脚踏实地,抬头求索:东西方媒体与开放社会四次专家会议的结论》中,Richard van der Wurff总结了四年来开放社会专家会议的成果。他展示了会议的中心主题如何从最初关注政府政策和媒体与社会组织和团体之间的权力平衡,转变为创新、宽容和欣赏多样性的内在动机。在上一次(2001年)会议上,人们对互联网在现代社会中的作用给予了很大的关注,然而,尚不清楚这种新媒介是否能解决现代社会面临的问题。本期的其他六篇文章关注的是互联网的作用。Yassen Zassoursky在《媒体与传播作为开放社会的载体:互联网与全球社会》一书中采用了理论和规范的方法。他设想开放社会概念是解决现代社会目前面临的问题的少数可能手段之一,特别是在9 / 11袭击之后。他将开放社会的概念与信息社会、公民社会、知识社会、消费主义社会、宽容社会以及宗教和意识形态原教旨主义等概念结合并进行了比较。在《欧洲信息社会:无事生非?》《国际传播研究期刊》