{"title":"The Environment and Context of the Glastonbury Lake Village: A Re-assessment","authors":"G. Aalbersberg, T. Brown","doi":"10.1179/jwa.2011.10.1.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Glastonbury Lake Village is one of very few wetland settlements to be almost entirely excavated in the British Isles and Europe. Its stratigraphic context was originally investigated by Godwin who correlated Glastonbury with a “second flood horizon” dated at c. 2060–1900 cal BP. Henceforth both were directly linked to marine incursions through the Axe valley in the late Iron Age. Godwin's investigations of the site lead him to believe that it bordered on open water to the east. Further stratigraphic work in the 1980s by Housley suggested that the village should be conceived of as a swamp village rather than a true lake village constructed in a very shallow lake or swamp. From both the remaining landscape features, its location and stratigraphy it is clear that it was close to a former course of the River Brue. This paper uses recent stratigraphic, pollen and diatom work in the Panborough Gap area and upstream of Glastonbury to re-assess the environment at the end of the third and beginning of the second millennia BP. A simple conceptual hydrogeological model is used to test hypotheses about the causes of flooding. The environmental data is consistent with the creation of tidal channels during the period of marine incursion in the early-mid Iron Age some of which remained open in the late 3rd millennium BP, and with the presence of marine and brackish water diatoms indicating periodic backing up of brackish water. The environmental evidence of a functioning partially estuarine channel to the north of the village is assessed in the light of the structural, artifactual and palaeoecological evidence from the original excavation. Both the broader environmental evidence and the archaeology suggest that Glastonbury Lake Village was in direct contact with the estuary of a tidal river discharging to the north through the Panborough Gap and Axe Valley and to the upper Brue valley to the south and west. In archaeological terms this may go some way to explaining the size, complexity and semi-specialised nature of the site. The evidence for abandonment due to rising water levels or flooding is also assessed and the case found as yet unproven and attention is drawn to other possible factors.","PeriodicalId":37928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wetland Archaeology","volume":"10 1","pages":"136 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/jwa.2011.10.1.136","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wetland Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/jwa.2011.10.1.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Abstract Glastonbury Lake Village is one of very few wetland settlements to be almost entirely excavated in the British Isles and Europe. Its stratigraphic context was originally investigated by Godwin who correlated Glastonbury with a “second flood horizon” dated at c. 2060–1900 cal BP. Henceforth both were directly linked to marine incursions through the Axe valley in the late Iron Age. Godwin's investigations of the site lead him to believe that it bordered on open water to the east. Further stratigraphic work in the 1980s by Housley suggested that the village should be conceived of as a swamp village rather than a true lake village constructed in a very shallow lake or swamp. From both the remaining landscape features, its location and stratigraphy it is clear that it was close to a former course of the River Brue. This paper uses recent stratigraphic, pollen and diatom work in the Panborough Gap area and upstream of Glastonbury to re-assess the environment at the end of the third and beginning of the second millennia BP. A simple conceptual hydrogeological model is used to test hypotheses about the causes of flooding. The environmental data is consistent with the creation of tidal channels during the period of marine incursion in the early-mid Iron Age some of which remained open in the late 3rd millennium BP, and with the presence of marine and brackish water diatoms indicating periodic backing up of brackish water. The environmental evidence of a functioning partially estuarine channel to the north of the village is assessed in the light of the structural, artifactual and palaeoecological evidence from the original excavation. Both the broader environmental evidence and the archaeology suggest that Glastonbury Lake Village was in direct contact with the estuary of a tidal river discharging to the north through the Panborough Gap and Axe Valley and to the upper Brue valley to the south and west. In archaeological terms this may go some way to explaining the size, complexity and semi-specialised nature of the site. The evidence for abandonment due to rising water levels or flooding is also assessed and the case found as yet unproven and attention is drawn to other possible factors.
格拉斯顿伯里湖村(Glastonbury Lake Village)是不列颠群岛和欧洲极少数几乎完全被挖掘的湿地聚落之一。它的地层背景最初是由戈德温研究的,他将格拉斯顿伯里与约2060-1900 cal BP的“第二洪水层”联系起来。从此以后,它们都与铁器时代晚期通过阿克斯山谷的海洋入侵直接相关。戈德温对这个地点的调查使他相信它东面与开阔水域接壤。豪斯利在20世纪80年代进行的进一步地层学研究表明,该村庄应该被视为一个沼泽村庄,而不是在非常浅的湖泊或沼泽中建造的真正的湖泊村庄。从残存的景观特征、它的位置和地层来看,很明显它靠近布鲁河的前河道。本文利用最近在Panborough Gap地区和Glastonbury上游的地层、花粉和硅藻工作,重新评估了BP第三世纪末和第二千年初的环境。一个简单的概念水文地质模型被用来检验关于洪水成因的假设。环境数据与铁器时代早期中期海洋入侵时期潮汐通道的形成一致,其中一些通道在3千年BP后期仍保持开放,与海洋和咸淡水硅藻的存在一致,表明咸淡水的周期性回流。根据原始挖掘的结构、人工和古生态证据,对村庄北部部分功能的河口河道的环境证据进行了评估。更广泛的环境证据和考古学都表明,格拉斯顿伯里湖村与一条潮汐河的河口直接接触,该河流向北流经潘伯勒峡谷和阿克斯山谷,向南和向西流向布鲁河谷上游。用考古学的术语来说,这可能在某种程度上解释了该遗址的规模、复杂性和半专业化的性质。还评估了由于水位上升或洪水而放弃的证据,发现案件尚未得到证实,并提请注意其他可能的因素。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wetland Archaeology publishes a wide range of contributions in all fields of wetland archaeology. It includes scientific and methodological features, geoprospection, environmental reconstruction, wetland hydrology, cultural aspects of wetland archaeology, as well as conservation, site management, legislation, and site protection. All periods and all geographic regions are covered.