Evaluation of a collaborative mental health program in primary care: effects on patient distress and health care utilization

J. Cigrang, A. C. Dobmeyer, Milton E. Becknell, R. Roa-Navarrete, S. R. Yerian
{"title":"Evaluation of a collaborative mental health program in primary care: effects on patient distress and health care utilization","authors":"J. Cigrang, A. C. Dobmeyer, Milton E. Becknell, R. Roa-Navarrete, S. R. Yerian","doi":"10.1185/135525706X121192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effectiveness of a collaborative model of mental health treatment under conditions of routine care in a primary care setting has received limited evaluation. Potential effects include reduced symptoms and decreased healthcare utilization. Methods: The present study describes treatment outcome for 234 patients seen by a mental health professional in a primary care clinic using a collaborative model of care. Patients were seen for one session (n = 120), two sessions (n = 59), three sessions (n = 29), or four or more sessions (n = 26). Patients completed the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ45) at every session. Results: OQ-45 total scores for patients seen for more than one appointment showed statistically significant reductions in psychological distress from first to last session for all groups. Pre-treatment health care utilization was unrelated to level of psychological distress at the first session. A comparison of health care utilization for the six month period before and after the first session showed a small but statistically significant increase in total number of medical visits. Conclusions: The results support the effectiveness of a collaborative model of mental health care for reducing symptoms in patients seen in a primary care setting. Patient’s overall healthcare utilization in the short term was largely unaffected.","PeriodicalId":54586,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","volume":"11 1","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1185/135525706X121192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of a collaborative model of mental health treatment under conditions of routine care in a primary care setting has received limited evaluation. Potential effects include reduced symptoms and decreased healthcare utilization. Methods: The present study describes treatment outcome for 234 patients seen by a mental health professional in a primary care clinic using a collaborative model of care. Patients were seen for one session (n = 120), two sessions (n = 59), three sessions (n = 29), or four or more sessions (n = 26). Patients completed the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ45) at every session. Results: OQ-45 total scores for patients seen for more than one appointment showed statistically significant reductions in psychological distress from first to last session for all groups. Pre-treatment health care utilization was unrelated to level of psychological distress at the first session. A comparison of health care utilization for the six month period before and after the first session showed a small but statistically significant increase in total number of medical visits. Conclusions: The results support the effectiveness of a collaborative model of mental health care for reducing symptoms in patients seen in a primary care setting. Patient’s overall healthcare utilization in the short term was largely unaffected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健合作精神健康项目的评估:对病人痛苦和卫生保健利用的影响
背景:在初级保健机构的常规护理条件下,协作精神健康治疗模式的有效性得到了有限的评估。潜在影响包括症状减轻和医疗保健利用率降低。方法:本研究描述了234名患者的治疗结果,由精神卫生专业人员在初级保健诊所使用协作模式的护理。患者接受了一次治疗(n = 120)、两次治疗(n = 59)、三次治疗(n = 29)或四次或更多治疗(n = 26)。患者在每个疗程完成结局问卷-45 (OQ45)。结果:在一次以上就诊的患者中,OQ-45总分显示,从第一次到最后一次就诊,所有组的心理困扰都有统计学上的显著减少。治疗前的卫生保健利用与第一次治疗时的心理困扰水平无关。对第一届会议前后六个月期间的保健利用情况的比较显示,就诊总次数虽小但在统计上有显著增加。结论:研究结果支持精神卫生保健协作模式在减轻初级保健患者症状方面的有效性。短期内患者的整体医疗保健利用率基本未受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the validity of the PHQ-9, HADS, BDI-II and QIDS-SR16 in measuring severity of depression in a UK sample of primary care patients with a diagnosis of depression: study protocol Managing demand for psychological services within an Australian primary mental healthcare initiative Improving identification of suicidal patients in primary care through routine screening Accuracy of primary care medical providers' understanding of the FDA black box warning label for antidepressants St John's Wort in depression: the patient's dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1