Legal Frameworks in the Sermons of Caesarius of Arles

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Medieval Sermon Studies Pub Date : 2014-10-01 DOI:10.1179/1366069114Z.00000000015
I. Filippov
{"title":"Legal Frameworks in the Sermons of Caesarius of Arles","authors":"I. Filippov","doi":"10.1179/1366069114Z.00000000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The texts of Caesarius of Arles are rightly counted among the most important historical sources for the Early Middle Ages. Despite this well-known fact they are insufficiently studied from the point of view of social history. The domain of law is especially neglected. Information on this subject is contained mainly in the numerous comparisons which Caesarius drew between the religious beliefs, attitudes, and practices he strove to impose on his flock, and the social realities of Arles of his day. The juridical terminology which he occasionally used is also quite revealing. Most of the data is of course on canon law. It is less informative than one could have hoped but it does shed light on some important areas, such as the social make-up of the parishioners; attendance at church by women, youngsters, and slaves; baptismal practices; the tithe, and almsgiving. Caesarius’ sermons also contain valuable facts pertaining to the persistence of many Roman legal notions and practices belonging to what can be qualified as ‘civil law’. Of special interest are the different data concerning ownership rights. On the one hand, the sermons prove that Arlesians of the sixth century were for the most part content with quasi-legal notions sufficient to describe their rights in this domain. On the other hand, the bishop’s use of words leaves no doubt that the predominant legal notion regarding ownership, to the detriment of all others, was possession.","PeriodicalId":38182,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Sermon Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"65 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1366069114Z.00000000015","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Sermon Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1366069114Z.00000000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The texts of Caesarius of Arles are rightly counted among the most important historical sources for the Early Middle Ages. Despite this well-known fact they are insufficiently studied from the point of view of social history. The domain of law is especially neglected. Information on this subject is contained mainly in the numerous comparisons which Caesarius drew between the religious beliefs, attitudes, and practices he strove to impose on his flock, and the social realities of Arles of his day. The juridical terminology which he occasionally used is also quite revealing. Most of the data is of course on canon law. It is less informative than one could have hoped but it does shed light on some important areas, such as the social make-up of the parishioners; attendance at church by women, youngsters, and slaves; baptismal practices; the tithe, and almsgiving. Caesarius’ sermons also contain valuable facts pertaining to the persistence of many Roman legal notions and practices belonging to what can be qualified as ‘civil law’. Of special interest are the different data concerning ownership rights. On the one hand, the sermons prove that Arlesians of the sixth century were for the most part content with quasi-legal notions sufficient to describe their rights in this domain. On the other hand, the bishop’s use of words leaves no doubt that the predominant legal notion regarding ownership, to the detriment of all others, was possession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔勒凯撒里乌斯布道中的法律框架
《阿尔勒凯撒留斯》的文本被认为是中世纪早期最重要的历史资料之一。尽管这是众所周知的事实,但从社会历史的角度来看,对它们的研究还不够充分。法律领域尤其被忽视。关于这一主题的信息主要包含在凯撒里乌斯在他努力强加给他的羊群的宗教信仰、态度和实践与他那个时代阿尔勒的社会现实之间的许多比较中。他偶尔使用的法律术语也很能说明问题。当然,大部分数据都是关于教会法的。它提供的信息比人们所希望的要少,但它确实揭示了一些重要的领域,比如教区居民的社会构成;妇女、年轻人和奴隶去教堂做礼拜;洗礼的实践;什一奉献和施舍。凯撒里乌斯的布道也包含有价值的事实,这些事实与许多罗马法律概念和实践的持久性有关,这些概念和实践属于可以被称为“民法”的东西。特别令人感兴趣的是关于所有权的不同数据。一方面,布道证明了六世纪的阿尔勒斯人在很大程度上满足于准法律概念,足以描述他们在这一领域的权利。另一方面,主教的用词毫无疑问地表明,关于所有权的主要法律概念是占有,这损害了所有其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medieval Sermon Studies
Medieval Sermon Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
SPECIAL SECTION: Medieval Sermons and Conversion: A Comparative Perspective The Lemma De predicatoribus in Iacobus de Benevento’s Viridarium consolationis : An Unexpected Preaching Tract in a Dominican Florilegium Classical Islamic Oration’s Art, Function, and Life-Altering Power of Persuasion: The Ultimate Response by Hammam to Ali’s Sermon on Piety, and by Hurr to Husayn’s Battle Oration in Karbala Attitudes towards Exempla in the Wycliffite Latin Sermon Cycles of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Laud misc. 200 Presidential Message Autumn 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1