You Can’t Fight the System: Strategies of Family Justice in Foster Care Reintegration

IF 1.2 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Family Journal Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1066480701091006
W. Crenshaw, D. Barnum
{"title":"You Can’t Fight the System: Strategies of Family Justice in Foster Care Reintegration","authors":"W. Crenshaw, D. Barnum","doi":"10.1177/1066480701091006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On first blush the very notion of justice seems an unlikely subject for family therapy intervention, a topic more in the domain of lawyers, judges, and philosophers, than psychologists, social workers, and family therapists. However, as Madanes (2000) has noted, issues of betrayal, mistreatment, disconnection, broken promises and divided loyalties both covert and overt, are core issues in most family conflicts. The outplacement of children from their biological families represents the worst-case scenarios of family injustice. In such cases, ways of working with either the biological or foster family are virtually incomparable to the therapy of an intact family, or even post-divorce blended family. Instead, the therapist is confronted with myriad problems that do not neatly fit within the confines of traditional family psychology. While extreme by definition, these cases offer unparalleled teaching about issues of justice, and their importance goes well beyond their specialized nature. This article illustrates one such case and the interventions we used to restore justice to a family caught up in “the system.”","PeriodicalId":47151,"journal":{"name":"Family Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"29 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1066480701091006","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480701091006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

On first blush the very notion of justice seems an unlikely subject for family therapy intervention, a topic more in the domain of lawyers, judges, and philosophers, than psychologists, social workers, and family therapists. However, as Madanes (2000) has noted, issues of betrayal, mistreatment, disconnection, broken promises and divided loyalties both covert and overt, are core issues in most family conflicts. The outplacement of children from their biological families represents the worst-case scenarios of family injustice. In such cases, ways of working with either the biological or foster family are virtually incomparable to the therapy of an intact family, or even post-divorce blended family. Instead, the therapist is confronted with myriad problems that do not neatly fit within the confines of traditional family psychology. While extreme by definition, these cases offer unparalleled teaching about issues of justice, and their importance goes well beyond their specialized nature. This article illustrates one such case and the interventions we used to restore justice to a family caught up in “the system.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你不能与体制抗争:寄养安置中的家庭正义策略
乍一看,正义的概念似乎不太可能是家庭治疗干预的主题,它更多地是律师、法官和哲学家的领域,而不是心理学家、社会工作者和家庭治疗师的领域。然而,正如Madanes(2000)所指出的那样,背叛、虐待、断绝关系、违背承诺以及隐蔽或公开的忠诚分裂等问题是大多数家庭冲突的核心问题。把孩子从他们的亲生家庭中安置出来代表了家庭不公正的最坏情况。在这种情况下,与亲生家庭或寄养家庭合作的方法实际上是无法与完整家庭甚至离婚后的混合家庭的治疗相比的。相反,治疗师面临着无数的问题,这些问题并不完全符合传统家庭心理学的范围。虽然从定义上讲,这些案例是极端的,但它们提供了关于正义问题的无与伦比的教学,它们的重要性远远超出了它们的专业性质。本文举例说明了一个这样的案例,以及我们用来为一个陷入“体制”的家庭恢复正义的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Journal
Family Journal FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families is the official journal of the International Association of Marriage and Family Counselors (IAMFC). The purpose of the journal is to advance the theory, research, and practice of counseling with couples and families from a family systems perspective.
期刊最新文献
African American Women and Self-Esteem Expressive Arts and Family Counseling: An Interview With Dr. Cathy Malchiodi Teaching in the Age of AI/ChatGPT in Mental-Health-Related Fields A Pilot Study Examining the Effectiveness of Gottman Method Couples Therapy Over Treatment-as-Usual Approaches for Treating Couples Dealing with Infidelity The Impact of PTSD and Depression on Romantic Attachment Within Incarcerated Romantic Relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1