Relation between head and eye movement and neck and shoulder complaints in presbyopic VDU users

M. Friedrich, Janette Kothe, E. Seidel, L. Beyer
{"title":"Relation between head and eye movement and neck and shoulder complaints in presbyopic VDU users","authors":"M. Friedrich, Janette Kothe, E. Seidel, L. Beyer","doi":"10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose In subjects with neck-shoulder complaints at visual display unit (VDU) work places (>4 hours daily) the influence through a multifocal lens design on the head-eye-movement was examined. Materials and methods The head-eye-movement (head-eye-mover ratio horizontal) was determined in 100 presbyopic subjects with the Vision Print® (Essilor). The subjects were randomized and single-blind divided to three different interventions, group I: head-, II: eye-mover design, III: nearwork design, and a control group with no intervention. Results In presbyopic subjects with neck-shoulder discomfort a workstation seams to contribute to the manifestation of the pathological stereotype eye mover in the horizontal gaze shift. With the multifocal lenses a significant reduction in complaints in the shoulder and neck area for the groups I, II and III was found. The change of the head-eye-mover ratio (horizontal) in the direction of increased head movement was shown tendencially in all supplied groups, but not in the control group. Conclusion If a patient with neck-shoulder complaints needs an optometric treatment (single or multifocal glasses) a modification of the work place is required and the supply with spectacles has to take place before a therapeutic intervention. On top of this a consultation for movement stimulating working conditions must take place.","PeriodicalId":88907,"journal":{"name":"International musculoskeletal medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"26 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Purpose In subjects with neck-shoulder complaints at visual display unit (VDU) work places (>4 hours daily) the influence through a multifocal lens design on the head-eye-movement was examined. Materials and methods The head-eye-movement (head-eye-mover ratio horizontal) was determined in 100 presbyopic subjects with the Vision Print® (Essilor). The subjects were randomized and single-blind divided to three different interventions, group I: head-, II: eye-mover design, III: nearwork design, and a control group with no intervention. Results In presbyopic subjects with neck-shoulder discomfort a workstation seams to contribute to the manifestation of the pathological stereotype eye mover in the horizontal gaze shift. With the multifocal lenses a significant reduction in complaints in the shoulder and neck area for the groups I, II and III was found. The change of the head-eye-mover ratio (horizontal) in the direction of increased head movement was shown tendencially in all supplied groups, but not in the control group. Conclusion If a patient with neck-shoulder complaints needs an optometric treatment (single or multifocal glasses) a modification of the work place is required and the supply with spectacles has to take place before a therapeutic intervention. On top of this a consultation for movement stimulating working conditions must take place.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老花眼VDU使用者头眼运动与颈肩疾患的关系
【摘要】目的观察在视觉显示单位(VDU)工作场所颈肩不适的被试(每天工作4小时),通过多焦点晶状体设计对头眼运动的影响。材料与方法使用视视路Vision Print®(Essilor)测量100例老花眼受试者的头眼运动(头眼运动比水平)。受试者被随机、单盲地分为三种不同的干预,第一组:头部干预,第二组:动眼设计,第三组:近工作设计,以及不进行干预的对照组。结果在有颈肩不适的老花眼受试者中,工作站可能是水平凝视移动中病理定型动眼的表现之一。使用多焦点晶状体后,发现I、II和III组肩颈部位的抱怨明显减少。在所有供给组中,头眼动比(水平)在头部运动增加的方向上都有变化趋势,但在对照组中没有变化。结论如果有颈肩疾患的患者需要验光治疗(单焦或多焦眼镜),则需要改变工作场所,并在治疗干预前提供眼镜。除此之外,还必须就促进运动的工作条件进行磋商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Musculo-skeletal and neurological aspects of Lyme disease Lyme disease: A patient's journey The effectiveness of scapular taping on pain and function in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare a novel group physiotherapy programme with a standard group exercise programme for managing chronic low back pain in primary care End of an era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1