{"title":"Relation between head and eye movement and neck and shoulder complaints in presbyopic VDU users","authors":"M. Friedrich, Janette Kothe, E. Seidel, L. Beyer","doi":"10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose In subjects with neck-shoulder complaints at visual display unit (VDU) work places (>4 hours daily) the influence through a multifocal lens design on the head-eye-movement was examined. Materials and methods The head-eye-movement (head-eye-mover ratio horizontal) was determined in 100 presbyopic subjects with the Vision Print® (Essilor). The subjects were randomized and single-blind divided to three different interventions, group I: head-, II: eye-mover design, III: nearwork design, and a control group with no intervention. Results In presbyopic subjects with neck-shoulder discomfort a workstation seams to contribute to the manifestation of the pathological stereotype eye mover in the horizontal gaze shift. With the multifocal lenses a significant reduction in complaints in the shoulder and neck area for the groups I, II and III was found. The change of the head-eye-mover ratio (horizontal) in the direction of increased head movement was shown tendencially in all supplied groups, but not in the control group. Conclusion If a patient with neck-shoulder complaints needs an optometric treatment (single or multifocal glasses) a modification of the work place is required and the supply with spectacles has to take place before a therapeutic intervention. On top of this a consultation for movement stimulating working conditions must take place.","PeriodicalId":88907,"journal":{"name":"International musculoskeletal medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"26 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1753614614Z.00000000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract Purpose In subjects with neck-shoulder complaints at visual display unit (VDU) work places (>4 hours daily) the influence through a multifocal lens design on the head-eye-movement was examined. Materials and methods The head-eye-movement (head-eye-mover ratio horizontal) was determined in 100 presbyopic subjects with the Vision Print® (Essilor). The subjects were randomized and single-blind divided to three different interventions, group I: head-, II: eye-mover design, III: nearwork design, and a control group with no intervention. Results In presbyopic subjects with neck-shoulder discomfort a workstation seams to contribute to the manifestation of the pathological stereotype eye mover in the horizontal gaze shift. With the multifocal lenses a significant reduction in complaints in the shoulder and neck area for the groups I, II and III was found. The change of the head-eye-mover ratio (horizontal) in the direction of increased head movement was shown tendencially in all supplied groups, but not in the control group. Conclusion If a patient with neck-shoulder complaints needs an optometric treatment (single or multifocal glasses) a modification of the work place is required and the supply with spectacles has to take place before a therapeutic intervention. On top of this a consultation for movement stimulating working conditions must take place.